Firefly Aerospace (FLY) vs Construction Partners (ROAD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Firefly Aerospace (FLY) has outperformed Construction Partners (ROAD) over the past year, losing 24.4% versus a loss of 27.2%. Construction Partners is the larger company by market cap ($5.03 billion vs $3.60 billion), about 1.4 times the size, while Firefly Aerospace is growing revenue faster (+163.0% vs +54.2%). Construction Partners converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 3.6% versus -186.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FLY | ROAD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $21.51 | $88.71 |
| Market cap | $3.60B | $5.03B |
| 1-day change | -5.78% | -5.52% |
| YTD return | -3.84% | -18.28% |
| 1-year return | -24.37% | -27.16% |
| 5-year return | — | +155.35% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 34.79 |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.00 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-0.26 | $2.55 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $159.85M | $2.81B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +162.95% | +54.20% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-298.34M | $101.78M |
| Gross margin | 19.18% | 15.61% |
| Operating margin | -163.08% | 7.99% |
| Net margin | -186.63% | 3.62% |
| 52-week high | $62.17 | $151.00 |
| 52-week low | $16.00 | $86.30 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -65.40% | -41.25% |
| Analyst consensus | none | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +79.45% | +60.71% |
| Average volume | 3.16M | 872.00K |
| Shares outstanding | 167.40M | 48.21M |
| Employees | 1,409 | 1,639 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Military/Government/Technical | Military/Government/Technical |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Construction Partners is more profitable, keeping 3.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -186.6 cents for Firefly Aerospace.
- Firefly Aerospace grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+162.95% vs +54.20%).
About Firefly Aerospace
FLY stock →Firefly Aerospace Inc. operates as a space and defense technology company and provides mission solutions for national security, government, and commercial customers in United States.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 1,409 employees
About Construction Partners
ROAD stock →Construction Partners, Inc., a civil infrastructure company, constructs and maintains roadways in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. The company provides various products and services to public and private infrastructure projects, such as highways, roads, bridges, airports, and commercial and residential developments.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 1,639 employees
FLY vs ROAD FAQ
Which is bigger, Firefly Aerospace or Construction Partners?
Construction Partners (ROAD) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.03B compared with $3.60B for Firefly Aerospace (FLY).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FLY or ROAD?
FLY returned -24.37% over the past 12 months, compared with -27.16% for ROAD (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Firefly Aerospace and Construction Partners in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Military/Government/Technical industry within the Industrials sector.