Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund (FMN) vs Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund (FMN) has outperformed Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS) over the past year, losing 9.8% versus a loss of 31.6%. Over five years, FMN leads with a -34.3% price change compared with -59.3% for VRTS. Virtus Investment Partners is the larger company by market cap ($867.0 million vs $77.2 million), about 11.2 times the size.
On valuation, Virtus Investment Partners trades at a lower trailing P/E (7.5x vs 8.7x for Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund). Virtus Investment Partners offers the higher dividend yield (7.33% vs 5.11%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FMN | VRTS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $9.88 | $130.91 |
| Market cap | $77.25M | $866.98M |
| 1-day change | -1.30% | -0.84% |
| YTD return | -11.07% | -19.76% |
| 1-year return | -9.77% | -31.55% |
| 5-year return | -34.31% | -59.30% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 8.67 | 7.47 |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.43 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.14 | $17.53 |
| Dividend yield | 5.11% | 7.33% |
| Annual dividend | $0.505 | $9.60 |
| 52-week high | $11.76 | $195.00 |
| 52-week low | $9.77 | $121.61 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.99% | -32.87% |
| Average volume | 32.50K | 133.37K |
| Shares outstanding | 7.82M | 6.62M |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Virtus Investment Partners is about 11.2 times larger than Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund by market value ($866.98M vs $77.25M).
- FMN has outperformed VRTS by 21.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Virtus Investment Partners offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (7.33% vs 5.11%).
FMN vs VRTS FAQ
Which is bigger, Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund or Virtus Investment Partners?
Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $866.98M compared with $77.25M for Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund (FMN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FMN or VRTS?
FMN returned -9.77% over the past 12 months, compared with -31.55% for VRTS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FMN or VRTS?
VRTS has the lower trailing P/E at 7.5, versus 8.7 for FMN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund or Virtus Investment Partners?
Virtus Investment Partners has the higher yield at 7.33%, compared with 5.11% for Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund.
Are Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund and Virtus Investment Partners in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.