Fabrinet (FN) vs SK Telecom (SKM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
SK Telecom (SKM) has outperformed Fabrinet (FN) over the past year, gaining 65.4% versus a gain of 34.5%. Over five years, FN leads with a +407.2% price change compared with -23.5% for SKM. Fabrinet is the larger company by market cap ($17.29 billion vs $13.15 billion), about 1.3 times the size.
On valuation, SK Telecom trades at a lower forward P/E (12.7x vs 22.1x for Fabrinet). SK Telecom pays a dividend yielding 4846.72%, while Fabrinet does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FN | SKM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $482.37 | $34.25 |
| Market cap | $17.29B | $13.15B |
| 1-day change | -3.13% | -3.71% |
| YTD return | +9.38% | +73.26% |
| 1-year return | +34.53% | +65.36% |
| 5-year return | +407.22% | -23.54% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 36.96 | 26.15 |
| Forward P/E | 22.14 | 12.72 |
| EPS (TTM) | $13.05 | $1.31 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4846.72% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1,660.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.64B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +35.73% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $473.03M | — |
| Gross margin | 11.99% | — |
| Operating margin | 9.97% | — |
| Net margin | 10.19% | — |
| 52-week high | $748.89 | $47.18 |
| 52-week low | $361.19 | $19.66 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -35.59% | -27.41% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +52.19% | +2.19% |
| Average volume | 867.13K | 1.89M |
| Shares outstanding | 35.83M | 383.89M |
| Employees | 21,521 | 4,840 |
| Sector | Utilities | Telecommunications |
| Industry | Telecommunications Equipment | Telecommunications Equipment |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- SKM has outperformed FN by 30.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Fabrinet trades at a higher earnings multiple (37.0x vs 26.1x trailing P/E).
- SK Telecom offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4846.72% vs 0.00%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Fabrinet in Utilities and SK Telecom in Telecommunications.
About Fabrinet
FN stock →Fabrinet provides optical packaging and precision optical, electro-mechanical, and electronic manufacturing services in North America, the Asia-Pacific, Europe, and internationally. The company offers a range of advanced optical and electro-mechanical capabilities in the manufacturing process, including process design and engineering, supply chain management, manufacturing, printed circuit board assembly, packaging, integration, final assembly, and testing.
Utilities · Telecommunications Equipment · 21,521 employees
About SK Telecom
SKM stock →SK Telecom Co., Ltd. engages in the provision of wireless telecommunication services in South Korea.
Telecommunications · Telecommunications Equipment · 4,840 employees
FN vs SKM FAQ
Which is bigger, Fabrinet or SK Telecom?
Fabrinet (FN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $17.29B compared with $13.15B for SK Telecom (SKM).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FN or SKM?
SKM returned +65.36% over the past 12 months, compared with +34.53% for FN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FN or SKM?
SKM has the lower trailing P/E at 26.1, versus 37.0 for FN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Fabrinet or SK Telecom?
SK Telecom pays a dividend yielding 4846.72%, while Fabrinet does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Fabrinet and SK Telecom in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Telecommunications Equipment industry within the Utilities sector.