Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) vs BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals (LEO)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) has outperformed BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals (LEO) over the past year, losing 5.2% versus a loss of 11.2%. Over five years, FOF leads with a -11.7% price change compared with -36.8% for LEO. Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund is the larger company by market cap ($347.8 million vs $345.7 million), about 1.0 times the size.
On valuation, Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (5.4x vs 27.8x for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals). BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals pays a dividend yielding 4.94%, while Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FOF | LEO |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $12.50 | $5.55 |
| Market cap | $347.82M | $345.71M |
| 1-day change | +0.48% | +1.46% |
| YTD return | -5.30% | -12.74% |
| 1-year return | -5.23% | -11.20% |
| 5-year return | -11.66% | -36.76% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 5.41 | 27.75 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.31 | $0.20 |
| Dividend yield | 8.35% | 4.94% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.274 |
| 52-week high | $15.04 | $6.55 |
| 52-week low | $12.12 | $5.41 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -16.89% | -15.27% |
| Average volume | 56.70K | 227.84K |
| Shares outstanding | 27.83M | 62.29M |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals trades at a higher earnings multiple (27.8x vs 5.4x trailing P/E).
- Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (8.35% vs 4.94%).
About Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund
FOF stock →Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund, Inc. is a close-ended fund of funds launched by Cohen & Steers Inc.
Finance · Investment Managers
About BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals
LEO stock →BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. is a closed ended fixed income mutual fund launched and managed by BNY Mellon Investment Adviser, Inc.
Finance · Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable
FOF vs LEO FAQ
Which is bigger, Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund or BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals?
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) is larger, with a market capitalization of $347.82M compared with $345.71M for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals (LEO).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FOF or LEO?
FOF returned -5.23% over the past 12 months, compared with -11.20% for LEO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FOF or LEO?
FOF has the lower trailing P/E at 5.4, versus 27.8 for LEO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund or BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals?
Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund has the higher yield at 8.35%, compared with 4.94% for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals.
Are Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund and BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals in the same industry?
Both are in the Finance sector, but in different industries: Investment Managers for Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund and Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals.