Fossil Group (FOSL) vs Wolverine World Wide (WWW)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Fossil Group (FOSL) has outperformed Wolverine World Wide (WWW) over the past year, gaining 191.8% versus a loss of 24.4%. Over five years, WWW leads with a -37.1% price change compared with -42.6% for FOSL. Wolverine World Wide is the larger company by market cap ($1.59 billion vs $422.8 million), about 3.8 times the size.
On valuation, Wolverine World Wide trades at a lower forward P/E (10.5x vs 55.0x for Fossil Group). Wolverine World Wide pays a dividend yielding 2.06%, while Fossil Group does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FOSL | WWW |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $7.15 | $19.43 |
| Market cap | $422.84M | $1.59B |
| 1-day change | +2.14% | +2.26% |
| YTD return | +90.16% | +7.05% |
| 1-year return | +191.84% | -24.37% |
| 5-year return | -42.62% | -37.12% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 15.06 |
| Forward P/E | 55.00 | 10.50 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-1.27 | $1.29 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.06% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.40 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $1.87B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +6.80% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $95.80M |
| Gross margin | — | 47.31% |
| Operating margin | — | 8.01% |
| Net margin | — | 5.11% |
| 52-week high | $7.33 | $27.73 |
| 52-week low | $1.70 | $13.47 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -2.46% | -29.93% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +25.87% | +25.06% |
| Average volume | 886.64K | 797.40K |
| Shares outstanding | 59.14M | 82.07M |
| Employees | 4,500 | 3,050 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Consumer Specialties | Shoe Manufacturing |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Wolverine World Wide is about 3.8 times larger than Fossil Group by market value ($1.59B vs $422.84M).
- FOSL has outperformed WWW by 216.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Wolverine World Wide offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.06% vs 0.00%).
About Fossil Group
FOSL stock →Fossil Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, markets, and distributes consumer fashion accessories in the United States, Europe, Asia, and internationally. The company's products include traditional watches, smartwatches, jewelry, handbags, small leather goods, belts, and sunglasses.
Consumer Discretionary · Consumer Specialties · 4,500 employees
About Wolverine World Wide
WWW stock →Wolverine World Wide, Inc. designs, manufactures, sources, markets, licenses, and distributes footwear, apparel, and accessories in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, Canada and Latin America.
Consumer Discretionary · Shoe Manufacturing · 3,050 employees
FOSL vs WWW FAQ
Which is bigger, Fossil Group or Wolverine World Wide?
Wolverine World Wide (WWW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.59B compared with $422.84M for Fossil Group (FOSL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FOSL or WWW?
FOSL returned +191.84% over the past 12 months, compared with -24.37% for WWW (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Fossil Group or Wolverine World Wide?
Wolverine World Wide pays a dividend yielding 2.06%, while Fossil Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Fossil Group and Wolverine World Wide in the same industry?
Both are in the Consumer Discretionary sector, but in different industries: Consumer Specialties for Fossil Group and Shoe Manufacturing for Wolverine World Wide.