MetaCap

Freshworks (FRSH) vs Workiva (WK)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Freshworks (FRSH) has outperformed Workiva (WK) over the past year, gaining 22.0% versus a loss of 17.0%. Over five years, WK leads with a -48.2% price change compared with -67.1% for FRSH. Workiva is the larger company by market cap ($4.01 billion vs $3.56 billion), about 1.1 times the size.

On valuation, Freshworks trades at a lower forward P/E (16.4x vs 18.2x for Workiva). Freshworks converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 21.9% versus -3.0%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

FRSH+22.00%WK-16.97%
+28%-13%-54%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
FRSH-67.97%WK-45.79%
+23%-32%-88%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

FRSH versus WK key metrics
MetricFRSHWK
Share price$13.64$73.69
Market cap$3.56B$4.01B
1-day change+0.29%+3.02%
YTD return+11.35%-14.56%
1-year return+22.00%-16.97%
5-year return-67.09%-48.21%
P/E ratio (TTM)21.6584.70
Forward P/E16.4418.20
EPS (TTM)$0.63$0.87
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$838.81M$884.57M
Revenue growth (YoY)+16.43%+19.75%
Net income (latest FY)$183.72M$-26.17M
Gross margin84.96%78.47%
Operating margin1.57%-4.80%
Net margin21.90%-2.96%
52-week high$14.37$97.10
52-week low$6.79$43.34
Distance from 52-week high-5.08%-24.11%
Analyst consensusnonestrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+8.43%+21.86%
Average volume8.74M1.05M
Shares outstanding236.96M50.85M
Employees4,5002,887
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryComputer Software: Prepackaged SoftwareComputer Software: Prepackaged Software

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • FRSH has outperformed WK by 39.0 percentage points over the past year.
  • Workiva trades at a higher earnings multiple (84.7x vs 21.7x trailing P/E).
  • Freshworks is more profitable, keeping 21.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -3.0 cents for Workiva.

About Freshworks

FRSH stock →

Freshworks Inc., a software development company, provides software-as-a-service products in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, and internationally. The company's software-as-a-service solutions includes Customer Experience (CX) and Employee Experience (EX).

Technology · Computer Software: Prepackaged Software · 4,500 employees

About Workiva

WK stock →

Workiva Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides cloud-based reporting solutions in the United States and internationally. The company provides Workiva platform, a multi-tenant cloud software that provides data-linking capabilities; audit trail services; administrators access management; and connects and transforms data from various enterprise resource planning, human capital management, and customer relationship management systems, as well as other third-party cloud and on-premise applications.

Technology · Computer Software: Prepackaged Software · 2,887 employees

FRSH vs WK FAQ

Which is bigger, Freshworks or Workiva?

Workiva (WK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.01B compared with $3.56B for Freshworks (FRSH).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, FRSH or WK?

FRSH returned +22.00% over the past 12 months, compared with -16.97% for WK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, FRSH or WK?

FRSH has the lower trailing P/E at 21.7, versus 84.7 for WK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Are Freshworks and Workiva in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Computer Software: Prepackaged Software industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons