MetaCap

First Solar (FSLR) vs Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) has outperformed First Solar (FSLR) over the past year, gaining 69.6% versus a loss of 22.7%. Over five years, LSCC leads with a +89.1% price change compared with +71.4% for FSLR. First Solar is the larger company by market cap ($19.22 billion vs $17.75 billion), about 1.1 times the size.

On valuation, First Solar trades at a lower forward P/E (7.7x vs 38.9x for Lattice Semiconductor). First Solar converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 29.3% versus 0.6%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

FSLR-22.70%LSCC+69.65%
+118%+43%-32%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
FSLR+82.56%LSCC+92.90%
+223%+86%-52%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

FSLR versus LSCC key metrics
MetricFSLRLSCC
Share price$178.85$124.98
Market cap$19.22B$17.75B
1-day change-0.71%-4.59%
YTD return-31.54%+69.86%
1-year return-22.70%+69.65%
5-year return+71.37%+89.11%
P/E ratio (TTM)11.03499.92
Forward P/E7.7038.88
EPS (TTM)$16.22$0.25
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$5.22B$523.26M
Revenue growth (YoY)+24.09%+2.72%
Net income (latest FY)$1.53B$3.08M
Gross margin40.62%68.21%
Operating margin30.59%2.15%
Net margin29.28%0.59%
52-week high$320.95$157.01
52-week low$168.60$60.50
Distance from 52-week high-44.27%-20.40%
Analyst consensusbuystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+54.17%+31.39%
Average volume2.27M1.74M
Shares outstanding107.47M142.03M
Employees7,9001,174
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductors

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • LSCC has outperformed FSLR by 92.3 percentage points over the past year.
  • Lattice Semiconductor trades at a higher earnings multiple (499.9x vs 11.0x trailing P/E).
  • First Solar is more profitable, keeping 29.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 0.6 cents for Lattice Semiconductor.
  • First Solar grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+24.09% vs +2.72%).

About First Solar

FSLR stock →

First Solar, Inc., a solar technology company, provides photovoltaic (PV) solar energy solutions in the United States, France, India, Chile, and internationally. The company manufactures and sells PV solar modules with thin film semiconductor technology that provides conventional crystalline silicon PV solar modules.

Technology · Semiconductors · 7,900 employees

About Lattice Semiconductor

LSCC stock →

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, develops and sells semiconductor, silicon-based and silicon-enabling, evaluation boards, and development hardware products in Asia, Europe, and the Americas. It offers field programmable gate arrays (FPGA), which are regular arrays of logic that can be custom-configured by the user through software.

Technology · Semiconductors · 1,174 employees

FSLR vs LSCC FAQ

Which is bigger, First Solar or Lattice Semiconductor?

First Solar (FSLR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $19.22B compared with $17.75B for Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, FSLR or LSCC?

LSCC returned +69.65% over the past 12 months, compared with -22.70% for FSLR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, FSLR or LSCC?

FSLR has the lower trailing P/E at 11.0, versus 499.9 for LSCC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Are First Solar and Lattice Semiconductor in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons