MetaCap

FitLife Brands (FTLF) vs IM Cannabis (IMCC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

FitLife Brands is the larger company by market cap ($86.7 million vs $3.1 million), about 27.7 times the size.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

FTLF versus IMCC key metrics
MetricFTLFIMCC
Share price$9.23$1.90
Market cap$86.68M$3.13M
1-day change+2.33%-2.06%
YTD return-43.27%—
1-year return-53.99%—
5-year return+33.77%—
P/E ratio (TTM)14.65—
Forward P/E7.16—
EPS (TTM)$0.63$-70.29
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
52-week high$20.98$77.10
52-week low$8.67$1.55
Distance from 52-week high-56.01%-97.54%
Average volume11.67K2.79M
Shares outstanding9.39M1.65M
SectorHealth CareHealth Care
Industry Medicinal Chemicals and Botanical Products Medicinal Chemicals and Botanical Products

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • FitLife Brands is about 27.7 times larger than IM Cannabis by market value ($86.68M vs $3.13M).

FTLF vs IMCC FAQ

Which is bigger, FitLife Brands or IM Cannabis?

FitLife Brands (FTLF) is larger, with a market capitalization of $86.68M compared with $3.13M for IM Cannabis (IMCC).

Are FitLife Brands and IM Cannabis in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Medicinal Chemicals and Botanical Products industry within the Health Care sector.

More comparisons