Fortive (FTV) vs USBC (USBC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Fortive (FTV) has outperformed USBC (USBC) over the past year, gaining 13.9% versus a loss of 50.9%. Over five years, FTV leads with a +3.2% price change compared with -99.5% for USBC. Fortive is the larger company by market cap ($17.07 billion vs $209.6 million), about 81.4 times the size.
On valuation, USBC trades at a lower trailing P/E (0.2x vs 30.4x for Fortive). Fortive pays a dividend yielding 0.21%, while USBC does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FTV | USBC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $56.52 | $0.54 |
| Market cap | $17.07B | $209.60M |
| 1-day change | -2.37% | -1.73% |
| YTD return | +2.37% | -14.29% |
| 1-year return | +13.93% | -50.91% |
| 5-year return | +3.22% | -99.46% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 30.39 | 0.23 |
| Forward P/E | 17.37 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.86 | $2.38 |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.12 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.16B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +1.92% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $579.20M | — |
| Gross margin | 63.50% | — |
| Operating margin | 17.32% | — |
| Net margin | 13.93% | — |
| 52-week high | $64.56 | $1.29 |
| 52-week low | $47.71 | $0.29 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -12.45% | -58.14% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +12.60% | — |
| Average volume | 2.44M | 312.90K |
| Shares outstanding | 302.02M | 388.14M |
| Employees | 10,000 | 16 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Scientific & Technical Instruments | Scientific & Technical Instruments |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Fortive is about 81.4 times larger than USBC by market value ($17.07B vs $209.60M).
- FTV has outperformed USBC by 64.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Fortive trades at a higher earnings multiple (30.4x vs 0.2x trailing P/E).
About Fortive
FTV stock →Fortive Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, and markets products, software, and services in the United States, China, and internationally. It operates through Intelligent Operating Solutions and Advanced Healthcare Solutions segments.
Technology · Scientific & Technical Instruments · 10,000 employees
About USBC
USBC stock →USBC, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates in digital financial technologies business in United States. The company develops transformative financial services, including digital assets, banking solutions, and non-invasive health monitoring research.
Technology · Scientific & Technical Instruments · 16 employees
FTV vs USBC FAQ
Which is bigger, Fortive or USBC?
Fortive (FTV) is larger, with a market capitalization of $17.07B compared with $209.60M for USBC (USBC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FTV or USBC?
FTV returned +13.93% over the past 12 months, compared with -50.91% for USBC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FTV or USBC?
USBC has the lower trailing P/E at 0.2, versus 30.4 for FTV. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Fortive or USBC?
Fortive pays a dividend yielding 0.21%, while USBC does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Fortive and USBC in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Scientific & Technical Instruments industry within the Technology sector.