MetaCap

H. B. Fuller (FUL) vs Mohawk Industries (MHK)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Mohawk Industries (MHK) has outperformed H. B. Fuller (FUL) over the past year, losing 2.3% versus a loss of 16.5%. Over five years, FUL leads with a -26.2% price change compared with -35.1% for MHK. Mohawk Industries is the larger company by market cap ($8.06 billion vs $2.67 billion), about 3.0 times the size.

On valuation, H. B. Fuller trades at a lower forward P/E (9.6x vs 11.9x for Mohawk Industries). H. B. Fuller pays a dividend yielding 1.94%, while Mohawk Industries does not currently pay one. H. B. Fuller converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 4.4% versus 3.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

FUL-16.50%MHK-2.30%
+16%-4%-25%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
FUL-21.38%MHK-33.14%
+38%-12%-62%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

FUL versus MHK key metrics
MetricFULMHK
Share price$49.58$118.94
Market cap$2.67B$8.06B
1-day change-1.70%-0.42%
YTD return-15.17%+9.28%
1-year return-16.50%-2.30%
5-year return-26.19%-35.10%
P/E ratio (TTM)13.8115.75
Forward P/E9.5711.89
EPS (TTM)$3.59$7.55
Dividend yield1.94%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.96$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$3.47B$10.79B
Revenue growth (YoY)-2.67%-0.48%
Net income (latest FY)$151.97M$369.90M
Gross margin31.11%23.87%
Operating margin—4.54%
Net margin4.37%3.43%
52-week high$68.63$140.30
52-week low$46.70$92.99
Distance from 52-week high-27.76%-15.22%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+37.74%+15.92%
Average volume776.11K1.00M
Shares outstanding53.83M67.74M
Employees7,10040,500
SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
IndustryHome FurnishingsHome Furnishings

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Mohawk Industries is about 3.0 times larger than H. B. Fuller by market value ($8.06B vs $2.67B).
  • MHK has outperformed FUL by 14.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • H. B. Fuller offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.94% vs 0.00%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: H. B. Fuller in Industrials and Mohawk Industries in Consumer Discretionary.

About H. B. Fuller

FUL stock →

H.B. Fuller Company, together with its subsidiaries, formulates, manufactures, and markets adhesives, sealants, coatings, polymers, tapes, encapsulants, additives, and other specialty chemical products.

Industrials · Home Furnishings · 7,100 employees

About Mohawk Industries

MHK stock →

Mohawk Industries, Inc. designs, manufactures, sources, distributes, and markets flooring products for residential and commercial remodeling, and new construction channels in the United States, Europe, Latin America, and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Home Furnishings · 40,500 employees

FUL vs MHK FAQ

Which is bigger, H. B. Fuller or Mohawk Industries?

Mohawk Industries (MHK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $8.06B compared with $2.67B for H. B. Fuller (FUL).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, FUL or MHK?

MHK returned -2.30% over the past 12 months, compared with -16.50% for FUL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, FUL or MHK?

FUL has the lower trailing P/E at 13.8, versus 15.8 for MHK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, H. B. Fuller or Mohawk Industries?

H. B. Fuller pays a dividend yielding 1.94%, while Mohawk Industries does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are H. B. Fuller and Mohawk Industries in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Home Furnishings industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons