MetaCap

GDS (GDS) vs Sportradar Group (SRAD)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

GDS (GDS) has outperformed Sportradar Group (SRAD) over the past year, losing 19.6% versus a loss of 51.2%. Over five years, GDS leads with a -47.6% price change compared with -48.7% for SRAD. GDS is the larger company by market cap ($6.19 billion vs $3.63 billion), about 1.7 times the size.

On valuation, Sportradar Group trades at a lower forward P/E (28.1x vs 4926.5x for GDS).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

GDS-19.56%SRAD-51.23%
+30%-15%-59%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
GDS-49.10%SRAD-47.02%
+41%-28%-97%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

GDS versus SRAD key metrics
MetricGDSSRAD
Share price$30.89$12.26
Market cap$6.19B$3.63B
1-day change+1.48%-1.49%
YTD return-12.78%-47.67%
1-year return-19.56%-51.23%
5-year return-47.55%-48.74%
P/E ratio (TTM)14.37204.25
Forward P/E—28.05
EPS (TTM)$2.15$0.06
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
52-week high$48.61$27.85
52-week low$26.97$11.39
Distance from 52-week high-36.45%-56.00%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+62.77%+47.45%
Average volume1.62M2.37M
Shares outstanding194.93M217.45M
Employees2,4344,882
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryComputer Software: Programming Data ProcessingComputer Software: Programming Data Processing

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • GDS has outperformed SRAD by 31.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Sportradar Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (204.3x vs 14.4x trailing P/E).

About GDS

GDS stock →

GDS Holdings Limited, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the development and operation of data centers in the People's Republic of China. It provides colocation services comprising critical facilities space, customer-available power, racks, and cooling; managed hosting services, including business continuity and disaster recovery, network management, data storage, system security, operating system, database, and server middleware services; managed cloud services; and consulting services.

Technology · Computer Software: Programming Data Processing · 2,434 employees

About Sportradar Group

SRAD stock →

Sportradar Group AG, together with its subsidiaries, provides sports data services for the sports betting and media industries in Switzerland, the United States, North America, Africa, Malta, the Asia Pacific, the Middle East, Europe, Latin America, and the Caribbean. The company offers betting technology and solutions, including betting and gaming content; real-time sports data points; pre-match and live odds services; streaming and betting engagement services; iGaming, which includes virtual soccer, horse and dog racing, basketball, tennis, baseball, and cricket; managed betting and trading services; and sports betting and gaming platform.

Technology · Computer Software: Programming Data Processing · 4,882 employees

GDS vs SRAD FAQ

Which is bigger, GDS or Sportradar Group?

GDS (GDS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.19B compared with $3.63B for Sportradar Group (SRAD).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, GDS or SRAD?

GDS returned -19.56% over the past 12 months, compared with -51.23% for SRAD (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, GDS or SRAD?

GDS has the lower trailing P/E at 14.4, versus 204.3 for SRAD. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Are GDS and Sportradar Group in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Computer Software: Programming Data Processing industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons