GE Vernova (GEV) vs Otis Worldwide (OTIS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
GE Vernova (GEV) has outperformed Otis Worldwide (OTIS) over the past year, gaining 64.5% versus a loss of 27.3%. GE Vernova is the larger company by market cap ($268.44 billion vs $24.89 billion), about 10.8 times the size. On valuation, Otis Worldwide trades at a lower forward P/E (14.4x vs 40.0x for GE Vernova).
Otis Worldwide offers the higher dividend yield (2.60% vs 0.17%). GE Vernova converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.8% versus 9.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GEV | OTIS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $1,007.91 | $65.39 |
| Market cap | $268.44B | $24.89B |
| 1-day change | +1.08% | -0.53% |
| YTD return | +52.56% | -24.74% |
| 1-year return | +64.50% | -27.28% |
| 5-year return | — | -21.83% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 28.90 | 16.81 |
| Forward P/E | 40.02 | 14.44 |
| EPS (TTM) | $34.88 | $3.89 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 2.60% |
| Annual dividend | $1.75 | $1.70 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $38.07B | $14.43B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.97% | +1.19% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $4.88B | $1.38B |
| Gross margin | 19.79% | — |
| Operating margin | 3.65% | 14.78% |
| Net margin | 12.83% | 9.59% |
| 52-week high | $1,195.94 | $94.57 |
| 52-week low | $530.16 | $63.58 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.72% | -30.85% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.07% | +32.34% |
| Average volume | 2.33M | 4.04M |
| Shares outstanding | 266.33M | 380.67M |
| Employees | 78,000 | 72,000 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics/Appliances | Consumer Electronics/Appliances |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- GE Vernova is about 10.8 times larger than Otis Worldwide by market value ($268.44B vs $24.89B).
- GEV has outperformed OTIS by 91.8 percentage points over the past year.
- GE Vernova trades at a higher earnings multiple (28.9x vs 16.8x trailing P/E).
- Otis Worldwide offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.60% vs 0.17%).
- GE Vernova grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+8.97% vs +1.19%).
About GE Vernova
GEV stock →GE Vernova Inc., an energy company, engages in the provision of various products and services that generate, transfer, orchestrate, convert, and store electricity in the United States, Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. The company operates through three segments: Power, Wind, and Electrification.
Technology · Consumer Electronics/Appliances · 78,000 employees
About Otis Worldwide
OTIS stock →Otis Worldwide Corporation engages in manufacturing, installation, and servicing of elevators and escalators in the United States, China, and internationally. The company operates in two segments, New Equipment and Service.
Technology · Consumer Electronics/Appliances · 72,000 employees
GEV vs OTIS FAQ
Which is bigger, GE Vernova or Otis Worldwide?
GE Vernova (GEV) is larger, with a market capitalization of $268.44B compared with $24.89B for Otis Worldwide (OTIS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GEV or OTIS?
GEV returned +64.50% over the past 12 months, compared with -27.28% for OTIS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GEV or OTIS?
OTIS has the lower trailing P/E at 16.8, versus 28.9 for GEV. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, GE Vernova or Otis Worldwide?
Otis Worldwide has the higher yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.17% for GE Vernova.
Are GE Vernova and Otis Worldwide in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Consumer Electronics/Appliances industry within the Technology sector.