GlobalFoundries (GFS) vs SiTime (SITM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
SiTime (SITM) has outperformed GlobalFoundries (GFS) over the past year, gaining 120.3% versus a gain of 37.7%. GlobalFoundries is the larger company by market cap ($26.80 billion vs $19.93 billion), about 1.3 times the size, while SiTime is growing revenue faster (+61.2% vs +0.6%). On valuation, GlobalFoundries trades at a lower forward P/E (18.3x vs 44.6x for SiTime).
GlobalFoundries pays a dividend yielding 0.25%, while SiTime does not currently pay one. GlobalFoundries converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.0% versus -13.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GFS | SITM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $48.07 | $665.16 |
| Market cap | $26.80B | $19.93B |
| 1-day change | -1.15% | -6.46% |
| YTD return | +37.66% | +88.33% |
| 1-year return | +37.70% | +120.25% |
| 5-year return | — | +199.00% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 37.55 | — |
| Forward P/E | 18.32 | 44.58 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.28 | $0.56 |
| Dividend yield | 0.25% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.12 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $6.79B | $326.66M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.61% | +61.16% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $885.00M | $-42.90M |
| Gross margin | 24.89% | 53.57% |
| Operating margin | 11.74% | -20.50% |
| Net margin | 13.03% | -13.13% |
| 52-week high | $92.55 | $901.81 |
| 52-week low | $32.02 | $243.68 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -48.06% | -26.24% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +55.36% | +27.71% |
| Average volume | 3.95M | 437.23K |
| Shares outstanding | 557.42M | 29.96M |
| Employees | 14,000 | 441 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- SITM has outperformed GFS by 82.6 percentage points over the past year.
- GlobalFoundries is more profitable, keeping 13.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -13.1 cents for SiTime.
- SiTime grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+61.16% vs +0.61%).
About GlobalFoundries
GFS stock →GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc., a semiconductor foundry, provides range of mainstream wafer fabrication services and technologies in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and internationally. It offers semiconductor devices, including microprocessors, mobile application processors, baseband processors, network processors, radio frequency modems, microcontrollers, and power management units.
Technology · Semiconductors · 14,000 employees
About SiTime
SITM stock →SiTime Corporation engages in the design, development, and sale of silicon timing systems solutions in Hong Kong, Taiwan, the United States, Singapore, and internationally. It offers various types of oscillators, as well as clock integrated circuits, resonators, and synchronization software for use in artificial intelligence systems, data center, communications, enterprise, automotive, industrial, aerospace, defense, mobile, Internet of Things, and consumer markets.
Technology · Semiconductors · 441 employees
GFS vs SITM FAQ
Which is bigger, GlobalFoundries or SiTime?
GlobalFoundries (GFS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $26.80B compared with $19.93B for SiTime (SITM).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GFS or SITM?
SITM returned +120.25% over the past 12 months, compared with +37.70% for GFS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, GlobalFoundries or SiTime?
GlobalFoundries pays a dividend yielding 0.25%, while SiTime does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are GlobalFoundries and SiTime in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector.