Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value (GGZ) vs Silvercrest Asset Management Group (SAMG)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value (GGZ) has outperformed Silvercrest Asset Management Group (SAMG) over the past year, gaining 5.2% versus a loss of 31.1%. Over five years, GGZ leads with a -6.0% price change compared with -34.5% for SAMG. Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value is the larger company by market cap ($114.8 million vs $80.0 million), about 1.4 times the size.
On valuation, Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value trades at a lower trailing P/E (4.7x vs 85.3x for Silvercrest Asset Management Group). Silvercrest Asset Management Group pays a dividend yielding 4.11%, while Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GGZ | SAMG |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $15.25 | $10.23 |
| Market cap | $114.84M | $80.02M |
| 1-day change | +1.40% | +0.39% |
| YTD return | +1.67% | -32.65% |
| 1-year return | +5.24% | -31.06% |
| 5-year return | -5.98% | -34.51% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 4.72 | 85.25 |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.88 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.23 | $0.12 |
| Dividend yield | 5.59% | 4.11% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.42 |
| 52-week high | $17.08 | $16.16 |
| 52-week low | $13.35 | $9.09 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -10.71% | -36.70% |
| Analyst consensus | — | none |
| Avg. price target upside | — | +75.95% |
| Average volume | 6.29K | 79.21K |
| Shares outstanding | 7.53M | 7.82M |
| Employees | — | 171 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- GGZ has outperformed SAMG by 36.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Silvercrest Asset Management Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (85.3x vs 4.7x trailing P/E).
- Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.59% vs 4.11%).
About Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value
GGZ stock →The Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value Trust is a closed-ended equity mutual fund launched by GAMCO Investors, Inc. The fund is managed by Gabelli Funds, LLC.
Finance · Investment Managers
About Silvercrest Asset Management Group
SAMG stock →Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc., a wealth management firm, provides financial advisory and related family office services in the United States. The company serves ultra-high net worth individuals and families, as well as their trusts; endowments; foundations; and other institutional investors.
Finance · Investment Managers · 171 employees
GGZ vs SAMG FAQ
Which is bigger, Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value or Silvercrest Asset Management Group?
Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value (GGZ) is larger, with a market capitalization of $114.84M compared with $80.02M for Silvercrest Asset Management Group (SAMG).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GGZ or SAMG?
GGZ returned +5.24% over the past 12 months, compared with -31.06% for SAMG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GGZ or SAMG?
GGZ has the lower trailing P/E at 4.7, versus 85.3 for SAMG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value or Silvercrest Asset Management Group?
Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value has the higher yield at 5.59%, compared with 4.11% for Silvercrest Asset Management Group.
Are Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value and Silvercrest Asset Management Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.