MetaCap

CGI (GIB) vs Innodata (INOD)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

CGI (GIB) has outperformed Innodata (INOD) over the past year, losing 23.4% versus a loss of 34.3%. Over five years, INOD leads with a +497.1% price change compared with -23.0% for GIB. CGI is the larger company by market cap ($14.60 billion vs $2.11 billion), about 6.9 times the size.

On valuation, CGI trades at a lower forward P/E (10.3x vs 29.4x for Innodata). CGI pays a dividend yielding 0.94%, while Innodata does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

GIB-23.45%INOD-34.33%
+35%-16%-68%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
GIB-20.56%INOD+522.58%
+1020%+449%-123%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

GIB versus INOD key metrics
MetricGIBINOD
Share price$70.49$61.41
Market cap$14.60B$2.11B
1-day change+1.16%+0.33%
YTD return-24.51%+20.12%
1-year return-23.45%-34.33%
5-year return-23.02%+497.07%
P/E ratio (TTM)12.1147.60
Forward P/E10.2829.41
EPS (TTM)$5.82$1.29
Dividend yield0.94%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.66$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)—$251.66M
Revenue growth (YoY)—+47.64%
Net income (latest FY)—$32.18M
Gross margin—39.53%
Operating margin—15.84%
Net margin—12.79%
52-week high$95.20$125.14
52-week low$59.63$34.23
Distance from 52-week high-25.96%-50.93%
Analyst consensusbuynone
Avg. price target upside+14.98%+99.90%
Average volume443.43K1.36M
Shares outstanding182.95M34.38M
Employees94,00010,020
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryTechnology
IndustryProfessional ServicesEDP Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CGI is about 6.9 times larger than Innodata by market value ($14.60B vs $2.11B).
  • GIB has outperformed INOD by 10.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Innodata trades at a higher earnings multiple (47.6x vs 12.1x trailing P/E).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: CGI in Consumer Discretionary and Innodata in Technology.

About CGI

GIB stock →

CGI Inc. provides information technology and business process services in Western and Southern Europe, the United States, Canada, Scandinavia, Northwest and Central-East Europe, the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, Finland, Poland, Baltics, and the Asia Pacific.

Consumer Discretionary · Professional Services · 94,000 employees

About Innodata

INOD stock →

Innodata Inc. operates as a data engineering company in the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Canada, Germany, Belgium, and internationally.

Technology · EDP Services · 10,020 employees

GIB vs INOD FAQ

Which is bigger, CGI or Innodata?

CGI (GIB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.60B compared with $2.11B for Innodata (INOD).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, GIB or INOD?

GIB returned -23.45% over the past 12 months, compared with -34.33% for INOD (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, GIB or INOD?

GIB has the lower trailing P/E at 12.1, versus 47.6 for INOD. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, CGI or Innodata?

CGI pays a dividend yielding 0.94%, while Innodata does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are CGI and Innodata in the same industry?

No. CGI is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while Innodata is in Technology.

More comparisons