Gildan Activewear (GIL) vs Under Armour (UAA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Under Armour (UAA) has outperformed Gildan Activewear (GIL) over the past year, losing 0.6% versus a loss of 32.4%. Over five years, GIL leads with a +12.8% price change compared with -76.5% for UAA. Gildan Activewear is the larger company by market cap ($7.77 billion vs $2.09 billion), about 3.7 times the size.
On valuation, Gildan Activewear trades at a lower forward P/E (7.7x vs 25.1x for Under Armour). Gildan Activewear pays a dividend yielding 2.26%, while Under Armour does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GIL | UAA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $41.97 | $4.87 |
| Market cap | $7.77B | $2.09B |
| 1-day change | +1.72% | +1.04% |
| YTD return | -33.94% | -3.02% |
| 1-year return | -32.36% | -0.62% |
| 5-year return | +12.76% | -76.50% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 32.04 | — |
| Forward P/E | 7.71 | 25.15 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.31 | $-1.15 |
| Dividend yield | 2.26% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.95 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.62B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +10.66% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $398.88M | — |
| Gross margin | 31.22% | — |
| Operating margin | 17.13% | — |
| Net margin | 11.02% | — |
| 52-week high | $73.70 | $8.15 |
| 52-week low | $39.93 | $4.13 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -43.05% | -40.25% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +95.38% | +28.75% |
| Average volume | 1.52M | 8.91M |
| Shares outstanding | 185.19M | 188.84M |
| Employees | 75,000 | 6,200 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Apparel | Apparel |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Gildan Activewear is about 3.7 times larger than Under Armour by market value ($7.77B vs $2.09B).
- UAA has outperformed GIL by 31.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Gildan Activewear offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.26% vs 0.00%).
About Gildan Activewear
GIL stock →Gildan Activewear Inc. manufactures and sells various apparel products.
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 75,000 employees
About Under Armour
UAA stock →Under Armour, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages designs, developing, marketing, and distributing performance apparel, footwear, and accessories for men, women, and youth. The company provides its apparel in compression, fitted, and loose fit types.
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 6,200 employees
GIL vs UAA FAQ
Which is bigger, Gildan Activewear or Under Armour?
Gildan Activewear (GIL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.77B compared with $2.09B for Under Armour (UAA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GIL or UAA?
UAA returned -0.62% over the past 12 months, compared with -32.36% for GIL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Gildan Activewear or Under Armour?
Gildan Activewear pays a dividend yielding 2.26%, while Under Armour does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Gildan Activewear and Under Armour in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Apparel industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.