Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities STRATS for Procter&Gamble Securities Series 2006-1 (GJR) vs PPlus Tr GSC-2 Tr Ctf Fltg Rate (PYT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities STRATS for Procter&Gamble Securities Series 2006-1 (GJR) has outperformed PPlus Tr GSC-2 Tr Ctf Fltg Rate (PYT) over the past year, losing 1.1% versus a loss of 1.9%. Over five years, GJR leads with a +3.5% price change compared with -6.3% for PYT.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GJR | PYT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $24.50 | $23.05 |
| 1-day change | 0.00% | -2.93% |
| YTD return | -1.37% | -1.16% |
| 1-year return | -1.05% | -1.91% |
| 5-year return | +3.46% | -6.30% |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 52-week high | $25.28 | $24.93 |
| 52-week low | $23.23 | $22.75 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -3.09% | -7.54% |
| Average volume | 385 | 731 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance: Consumer Services | Finance: Consumer Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
GJR vs PYT FAQ
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GJR or PYT?
GJR returned -1.05% over the past 12 months, compared with -1.91% for PYT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities STRATS for Procter&Gamble Securities Series 2006-1 and PPlus Tr GSC-2 Tr Ctf Fltg Rate in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance: Consumer Services industry within the Finance sector.