MetaCap

Liberty Capital Series C GCI Group (GLIBK) vs Iridium Communications (IRDM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Iridium Communications (IRDM) has outperformed Liberty Capital Series C GCI Group (GLIBK) over the past year, gaining 149.0% versus a loss of 34.4%. Iridium Communications is the larger company by market cap ($5.05 billion vs $931.4 million), about 5.4 times the size. Iridium Communications pays a dividend yielding 1.26%, while Liberty Capital Series C GCI Group does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

GLIBK-34.39%IRDM+149.02%
+199%+71%-57%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
GLIBK-23.86%IRDM+53.77%
+77%+11%-55%
Jul 7, 20255 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

GLIBK versus IRDM key metrics
MetricGLIBKIRDM
Share price$23.34$47.67
Market cap$931.38M$5.05B
1-day change-1.44%-1.43%
YTD return-36.36%+178.25%
1-year return-34.39%+149.02%
5-year return—+23.27%
P/E ratio (TTM)—54.17
Forward P/E—27.80
EPS (TTM)$-11.10$0.88
Dividend yield0.00%1.26%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.60
Revenue (latest FY)—$871.66M
Revenue growth (YoY)—+4.93%
Net income (latest FY)—$114.37M
Operating margin—27.07%
Net margin—13.12%
52-week high$41.18$57.18
52-week low$19.30$15.65
Distance from 52-week high-43.32%-16.63%
Analyst consensus—none
Avg. price target upside—-11.89%
Average volume391.94K1.17M
Shares outstanding35.85M105.98M
Employees1,880975
SectorTelecommunicationsConsumer Discretionary
IndustryCable & Other Pay Television ServicesTelecommunications Equipment

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Iridium Communications is about 5.4 times larger than Liberty Capital Series C GCI Group by market value ($5.05B vs $931.38M).
  • IRDM has outperformed GLIBK by 183.4 percentage points over the past year.
  • Iridium Communications offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.26% vs 0.00%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Liberty Capital Series C GCI Group in Telecommunications and Iridium Communications in Consumer Discretionary.

About Liberty Capital Series C GCI Group

GLIBK stock →

Liberty Capital Corporation, through its subsidiaries, provides a range of data, wireless, video, voice, and managed services in Alaska. The company also offers wireless and wireline telecommunication services; and owns and operates a statewide wireless network.

Telecommunications · Cable & Other Pay Television Services · 1,880 employees

About Iridium Communications

IRDM stock →

Iridium Communications Inc. provides mobile voice and data communications services and products to businesses, the United States and foreign governments, non-governmental organizations, and consumers in the United States, Canada, and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Telecommunications Equipment · 975 employees

GLIBK vs IRDM FAQ

Which is bigger, Liberty Capital Series C GCI Group or Iridium Communications?

Iridium Communications (IRDM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.05B compared with $931.38M for Liberty Capital Series C GCI Group (GLIBK).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, GLIBK or IRDM?

IRDM returned +149.02% over the past 12 months, compared with -34.39% for GLIBK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which pays a higher dividend, Liberty Capital Series C GCI Group or Iridium Communications?

Iridium Communications pays a dividend yielding 1.26%, while Liberty Capital Series C GCI Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Liberty Capital Series C GCI Group and Iridium Communications in the same industry?

No. Liberty Capital Series C GCI Group is in the Telecommunications sector, while Iridium Communications is in Consumer Discretionary.

More comparisons