Acushnet (GOLF) vs Peloton Interactive (PTON)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Acushnet (GOLF) has outperformed Peloton Interactive (PTON) over the past year, gaining 0.4% versus a loss of 33.7%. Over five years, GOLF leads with a +69.2% price change compared with -94.3% for PTON. Acushnet is the larger company by market cap ($4.71 billion vs $2.11 billion), about 2.2 times the size.
On valuation, Acushnet trades at a lower forward P/E (19.0x vs 20.3x for Peloton Interactive). Acushnet pays a dividend yielding 1.22%, while Peloton Interactive does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GOLF | PTON |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $80.57 | $4.80 |
| Market cap | $4.71B | $2.11B |
| 1-day change | -2.88% | -1.03% |
| YTD return | +0.94% | -21.27% |
| 1-year return | +0.36% | -33.65% |
| 5-year return | +69.19% | -94.30% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 21.89 | 34.29 |
| Forward P/E | 19.02 | 20.28 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.68 | $0.14 |
| Dividend yield | 1.22% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.98 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.56B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.14% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $188.54M | — |
| Gross margin | 47.73% | — |
| Operating margin | 11.70% | — |
| Net margin | 7.37% | — |
| 52-week high | $119.65 | $8.19 |
| 52-week low | $75.16 | $3.65 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -32.66% | -41.39% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +23.71% | +64.58% |
| Average volume | 355.28K | 8.45M |
| Shares outstanding | 58.41M | 423.04M |
| Employees | 7,300 | 2,199 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Recreational Games/Products/Toys | Recreational Games/Products/Toys |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Acushnet is about 2.2 times larger than Peloton Interactive by market value ($4.71B vs $2.11B).
- GOLF has outperformed PTON by 34.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Peloton Interactive trades at a higher earnings multiple (34.3x vs 21.9x trailing P/E).
- Acushnet offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.22% vs 0.00%).
About Acushnet
GOLF stock →Acushnet Holdings Corp. designs, develops, manufactures, and distributes golf products in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, Africa, Japan, Korea, and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Recreational Games/Products/Toys · 7,300 employees
About Peloton Interactive
PTON stock →Peloton Interactive, Inc. provides fitness and wellness products and services in North America and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Recreational Games/Products/Toys · 2,199 employees
GOLF vs PTON FAQ
Which is bigger, Acushnet or Peloton Interactive?
Acushnet (GOLF) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.71B compared with $2.11B for Peloton Interactive (PTON).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GOLF or PTON?
GOLF returned +0.36% over the past 12 months, compared with -33.65% for PTON (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GOLF or PTON?
GOLF has the lower trailing P/E at 21.9, versus 34.3 for PTON. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Acushnet or Peloton Interactive?
Acushnet pays a dividend yielding 1.22%, while Peloton Interactive does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Acushnet and Peloton Interactive in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Recreational Games/Products/Toys industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.