Hudbay Minerals (HBM) vs Rio Tinto Plc (RIO)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Hudbay Minerals (HBM) has outperformed Rio Tinto Plc (RIO) over the past year, gaining 64.8% versus a gain of 40.6%. Over five years, HBM leads with a +245.9% price change compared with +32.3% for RIO. Rio Tinto Plc is the larger company by market cap ($151.51 billion vs $11.49 billion), about 13.2 times the size, while Hudbay Minerals is growing revenue faster (+9.4% vs +7.4%).
On valuation, Rio Tinto Plc trades at a lower forward P/E (10.9x vs 12.9x for Hudbay Minerals). Rio Tinto Plc offers the higher dividend yield (4.99% vs 0.08%). Hudbay Minerals converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 25.7% versus 17.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | HBM | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $25.87 | $93.16 |
| Market cap | $11.49B | $151.51B |
| 1-day change | -4.01% | -2.85% |
| YTD return | +31.11% | +16.41% |
| 1-year return | +64.82% | +40.62% |
| 5-year return | +245.86% | +32.27% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 15.13 | 12.62 |
| Forward P/E | 12.94 | 10.88 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.71 | $7.38 |
| Dividend yield | 0.08% | 4.99% |
| Annual dividend | $0.021 | $4.65 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.21B | $57.64B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.39% | +7.42% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $568.50M | $9.97B |
| Gross margin | 33.61% | — |
| Operating margin | 41.45% | 25.91% |
| Net margin | 25.71% | 17.29% |
| 52-week high | $32.15 | $112.58 |
| 52-week low | $14.34 | $65.35 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -19.53% | -17.25% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +35.37% | +10.72% |
| Average volume | 4.53M | 2.27M |
| Shares outstanding | 444.14M | 1.25B |
| Employees | — | 56,890 |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Metal Mining | Metal Mining |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Rio Tinto Plc is about 13.2 times larger than Hudbay Minerals by market value ($151.51B vs $11.49B).
- HBM has outperformed RIO by 24.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Rio Tinto Plc offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.99% vs 0.08%).
- Hudbay Minerals is more profitable, keeping 25.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 17.3 cents for Rio Tinto Plc.
About Hudbay Minerals
HBM stock →Hudbay Minerals Inc., a diversified mining company, focuses on the exploration, development, operation, and optimization of properties in North and South America. It primarily explores for copper concentrates containing copper, gold, zinc, molybdenum concentrates, and silver.
Basic Materials · Metal Mining
About Rio Tinto Plc
RIO stock →Rio Tinto Group engages in exploring, mining, and processing mineral resources worldwide. The company operates through Iron Ore; Aluminium and lithium; and Copper segments.
Basic Materials · Metal Mining · 56,890 employees
HBM vs RIO FAQ
Which is bigger, Hudbay Minerals or Rio Tinto Plc?
Rio Tinto Plc (RIO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $151.51B compared with $11.49B for Hudbay Minerals (HBM).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, HBM or RIO?
HBM returned +64.82% over the past 12 months, compared with +40.62% for RIO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, HBM or RIO?
RIO has the lower trailing P/E at 12.6, versus 15.1 for HBM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Hudbay Minerals or Rio Tinto Plc?
Rio Tinto Plc has the higher yield at 4.99%, compared with 0.08% for Hudbay Minerals.
Are Hudbay Minerals and Rio Tinto Plc in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Metal Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector.