MetaCap

Hub Group (HUBG) vs Radiant Logistics (RLGT)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Radiant Logistics (RLGT) has outperformed Hub Group (HUBG) over the past year, gaining 54.3% versus a loss of 26.6%. Over five years, RLGT leads with a +53.6% price change compared with -29.3% for HUBG. Hub Group is the larger company by market cap ($1.58 billion vs $431.9 million), about 3.6 times the size.

On valuation, Hub Group trades at a lower forward P/E (11.9x vs 16.9x for Radiant Logistics). Hub Group pays a dividend yielding 1.94%, while Radiant Logistics does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

HUBG-26.75%RLGT+54.34%
+65%+17%-31%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
HUBG-27.18%RLGT+51.36%
+56%+13%-31%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

HUBG versus RLGT key metrics
MetricHUBGRLGT
Share price$25.76$9.21
Market cap$1.58B$431.90M
1-day change-2.53%-2.33%
YTD return-39.54%+48.97%
1-year return-26.61%+54.34%
5-year return-29.26%+53.58%
P/E ratio (TTM)14.8023.62
Forward P/E11.9216.90
EPS (TTM)$1.74$0.39
Dividend yield1.94%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.50$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$3.95B—
Revenue growth (YoY)-6.10%—
Net income (latest FY)$103.99M—
Operating margin3.55%—
Net margin2.64%—
52-week high$53.26$10.20
52-week low$25.64$5.86
Distance from 52-week high-51.63%-9.71%
Analyst consensusbuynone
Avg. price target upside+46.23%+19.44%
Average volume1.22M211.65K
Shares outstanding60.58M46.89M
Employees6,6041,080
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIntegrated Freight & LogisticsIntegrated Freight & Logistics

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Hub Group is about 3.6 times larger than Radiant Logistics by market value ($1.58B vs $431.90M).
  • RLGT has outperformed HUBG by 80.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Radiant Logistics trades at a higher earnings multiple (23.6x vs 14.8x trailing P/E).
  • Hub Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.94% vs 0.00%).

About Hub Group

HUBG stock →

Hub Group, Inc., a supply chain solutions provider, offers transportation and logistics management services in North America. It operates in two segments, Intermodal and Transportation Solutions (ITS), and Logistics.

Industrials · Integrated Freight & Logistics · 6,604 employees

About Radiant Logistics

RLGT stock →

Radiant Logistics, Inc., operates as a third-party logistics company, provides technology-enabled global transportation and value-added logistics services in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The company offers domestic and international air and ocean freight forwarding, and freight brokerage services, including truckload, less-than-truckload (LTL), and intermodal.

Industrials · Integrated Freight & Logistics · 1,080 employees

HUBG vs RLGT FAQ

Which is bigger, Hub Group or Radiant Logistics?

Hub Group (HUBG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.58B compared with $431.90M for Radiant Logistics (RLGT).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, HUBG or RLGT?

RLGT returned +54.34% over the past 12 months, compared with -26.61% for HUBG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, HUBG or RLGT?

HUBG has the lower trailing P/E at 14.8, versus 23.6 for RLGT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Hub Group or Radiant Logistics?

Hub Group pays a dividend yielding 1.94%, while Radiant Logistics does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Hub Group and Radiant Logistics in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons