MetaCap

Hawkins (HWKN) vs Ingevity (NGVT)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Ingevity (NGVT) has outperformed Hawkins (HWKN) over the past year, gaining 31.3% versus a loss of 28.4%. Over five years, HWKN leads with a +233.1% price change compared with -8.4% for NGVT. Hawkins is the larger company by market cap ($2.67 billion vs $2.45 billion), about 1.1 times the size.

On valuation, Ingevity trades at a lower forward P/E (11.9x vs 26.6x for Hawkins). Hawkins pays a dividend yielding 0.59%, while Ingevity does not currently pay one. Hawkins converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.5% versus -14.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

HWKN-28.45%NGVT+31.34%
+47%+5%-38%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
HWKN+244.91%NGVT-5.27%
+416%+168%-81%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

HWKN versus NGVT key metrics
MetricHWKNNGVT
Share price$127.79$71.41
Market cap$2.67B$2.45B
1-day change-3.47%+0.69%
YTD return-10.05%+20.67%
1-year return-28.45%+31.34%
5-year return+233.13%-8.39%
P/E ratio (TTM)33.11102.01
Forward P/E26.6411.88
EPS (TTM)$3.86$0.70
Dividend yield0.59%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.76$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$1.08B$1.17B
Revenue growth (YoY)+11.21%-2.71%
Net income (latest FY)$81.55M$-167.10M
Gross margin22.61%39.53%
Operating margin11.19%35.86%
Net margin7.52%-14.31%
52-week high$176.58$79.29
52-week low$116.05$45.85
Distance from 52-week high-27.63%-9.94%
Analyst consensusnonestrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+36.36%+24.63%
Average volume166.27K250.57K
Shares outstanding20.88M34.38M
Employees1,2001,400
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
IndustrySpecialty ChemicalsMajor Chemicals

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • NGVT has outperformed HWKN by 59.8 percentage points over the past year.
  • Ingevity trades at a higher earnings multiple (102.0x vs 33.1x trailing P/E).
  • Hawkins is more profitable, keeping 7.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -14.3 cents for Ingevity.
  • Hawkins grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+11.21% vs -2.71%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Hawkins in Consumer Discretionary and Ingevity in Industrials.

About Hawkins

HWKN stock →

Hawkins, Inc. operates as a water treatment and specialty ingredients company in the United States.

Consumer Discretionary · Specialty Chemicals · 1,200 employees

About Ingevity

NGVT stock →

Ingevity Corporation manufactures and sells activated carbon products, derivative specialty chemicals, and engineered polymers in North America, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and South America. It operates through three segments: Performance Materials, Performance Chemicals, and Advanced Polymer Technologies.

Industrials · Major Chemicals · 1,400 employees

HWKN vs NGVT FAQ

Which is bigger, Hawkins or Ingevity?

Hawkins (HWKN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.67B compared with $2.45B for Ingevity (NGVT).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, HWKN or NGVT?

NGVT returned +31.34% over the past 12 months, compared with -28.45% for HWKN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, HWKN or NGVT?

HWKN has the lower trailing P/E at 33.1, versus 102.0 for NGVT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Hawkins or Ingevity?

Hawkins pays a dividend yielding 0.59%, while Ingevity does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Hawkins and Ingevity in the same industry?

No. Hawkins is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while Ingevity is in Industrials.

More comparisons