MetaCap

Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) vs Nasdaq (NDAQ)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) has outperformed Nasdaq (NDAQ) over the past year, gaining 20.0% versus a gain of 2.8%. Over five years, IBKR leads with a +386.5% price change compared with +36.5% for NDAQ. Interactive Brokers Group is the larger company by market cap ($149.37 billion vs $52.27 billion), about 2.9 times the size.

On valuation, Nasdaq trades at a lower forward P/E (20.0x vs 26.9x for Interactive Brokers Group). Nasdaq offers the higher dividend yield (1.20% vs 0.37%). Interactive Brokers Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 178.6% versus 21.6%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

IBKR+20.01%NDAQ+2.78%
+39%+11%-18%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
IBKR+382.67%NDAQ+40.38%
+459%+204%-51%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

IBKR versus NDAQ key metrics
MetricIBKRNDAQ
Share price$87.67$93.51
Market cap$149.37B$52.27B
1-day change+1.39%+1.23%
YTD return+34.46%-4.90%
1-year return+20.01%+2.78%
5-year return+386.54%+36.49%
P/E ratio (TTM)34.7927.26
Forward P/E26.9319.98
EPS (TTM)$2.52$3.43
Dividend yield0.37%1.20%
Annual dividend$0.328$1.12
Revenue (latest FY)$2.44B$8.26B
Revenue growth (YoY)+23.42%+11.65%
Net income (latest FY)$4.36B$1.79B
Gross margin—63.53%
Operating margin—28.21%
Net margin178.57%21.64%
52-week high$98.75$101.79
52-week low$58.95$76.55
Distance from 52-week high-11.22%-8.14%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+19.98%+16.64%
Average volume4.12M3.28M
Shares outstanding453.08M558.98M
Employees3,2659,630
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment Bankers/Brokers/ServiceInvestment Bankers/Brokers/Service

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Interactive Brokers Group is about 2.9 times larger than Nasdaq by market value ($149.37B vs $52.27B).
  • IBKR has outperformed NDAQ by 17.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • Interactive Brokers Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (34.8x vs 27.3x trailing P/E).
  • Interactive Brokers Group is more profitable, keeping 178.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 21.6 cents for Nasdaq.
  • Interactive Brokers Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+23.42% vs +11.65%).

About Interactive Brokers Group

IBKR stock →

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. operates as an automated electronic broker in the United States and internationally.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 3,265 employees

About Nasdaq

NDAQ stock →

Nasdaq, Inc. operates as a technology company that serves capital markets and other industries in the United States and internationally.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 9,630 employees

IBKR vs NDAQ FAQ

Which is bigger, Interactive Brokers Group or Nasdaq?

Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $149.37B compared with $52.27B for Nasdaq (NDAQ).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, IBKR or NDAQ?

IBKR returned +20.01% over the past 12 months, compared with +2.78% for NDAQ (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, IBKR or NDAQ?

NDAQ has the lower trailing P/E at 27.3, versus 34.8 for IBKR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Interactive Brokers Group or Nasdaq?

Nasdaq has the higher yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.37% for Interactive Brokers Group.

Are Interactive Brokers Group and Nasdaq in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons