MetaCap

IDACORP (IDA) vs Korea Electric Power (KEP)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

IDACORP (IDA) has outperformed Korea Electric Power (KEP) over the past year, losing 0.5% versus a loss of 14.2%. Over five years, IDA leads with a +27.4% price change compared with +12.6% for KEP. Korea Electric Power is the larger company by market cap ($14.16 billion vs $7.83 billion), about 1.8 times the size.

On valuation, Korea Electric Power trades at a lower forward P/E (3.9x vs 19.5x for IDACORP). Korea Electric Power offers the higher dividend yield (13980.05% vs 2.58%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

IDA-0.53%KEP-14.22%
+88%+34%-20%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
IDA+31.81%KEP+14.11%
+143%+48%-47%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

IDA versus KEP key metrics
MetricIDAKEP
Share price$135.42$11.03
Market cap$7.83B$14.16B
1-day change+1.00%+1.01%
YTD return+5.94%-33.82%
1-year return-0.53%-14.22%
5-year return+27.40%+12.58%
P/E ratio (TTM)22.462.62
Forward P/E19.483.91
EPS (TTM)$6.03$4.21
Dividend yield2.58%13980.05%
Annual dividend$3.50$1,542.00
Revenue (latest FY)$1.75B—
Revenue growth (YoY)-1.24%—
Net income (latest FY)$323.47M—
Operating margin20.26%—
Net margin18.52%—
52-week high$154.91$23.41
52-week low$124.12$10.78
Distance from 52-week high-12.58%-52.88%
Analyst consensusbuynone
Avg. price target upside+16.18%+35.99%
Average volume542.87K1.01M
Shares outstanding57.84M1.28B
Employees2,17422,693
SectorUtilitiesUtilities
IndustryElectric Utilities: CentralElectric Utilities: Central

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • IDA has outperformed KEP by 13.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • IDACORP trades at a higher earnings multiple (22.5x vs 2.6x trailing P/E).
  • Korea Electric Power offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (13980.05% vs 2.58%).

About IDACORP

IDA stock →

IDACORP, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the generation, transmission, distribution, purchase, and sale of electric energy in the United States. The company operates 17 hydropower generating plants located in southern Idaho and eastern Oregon; and three natural gas-fired plants situated in southern Idaho, as well as interests in a coal-fired and natural gas-fired steam generating plant located in Wyoming; and interests in a coal-fired steam generating plant situated in Nevada.

Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 2,174 employees

About Korea Electric Power

KEP stock →

Korea Electric Power Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity in South Korea and internationally. The company operates through five segments: Electricity Sales, Nuclear Power Generation, Thermal Power Generation, Power Support, and Other.

Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 22,693 employees

IDA vs KEP FAQ

Which is bigger, IDACORP or Korea Electric Power?

Korea Electric Power (KEP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.16B compared with $7.83B for IDACORP (IDA).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, IDA or KEP?

IDA returned -0.53% over the past 12 months, compared with -14.22% for KEP (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, IDA or KEP?

KEP has the lower trailing P/E at 2.6, versus 22.5 for IDA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, IDACORP or Korea Electric Power?

Korea Electric Power has the higher yield at 13980.05%, compared with 2.58% for IDACORP.

Are IDACORP and Korea Electric Power in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Electric Utilities: Central industry within the Utilities sector.

More comparisons