Intel (INTC) vs Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Intel (INTC) has outperformed Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) over the past year, gaining 203.5% versus a gain of 51.2%. Over five years, MPWR leads with a +197.1% price change compared with +107.2% for INTC. Intel is the larger company by market cap ($597.96 billion vs $70.08 billion), about 8.5 times the size, while Monolithic Power Systems is growing revenue faster (+26.4% vs -0.5%).
On valuation, Monolithic Power Systems trades at a lower forward P/E (40.8x vs 54.3x for Intel). Monolithic Power Systems pays a dividend yielding 0.50%, while Intel does not currently pay one. Monolithic Power Systems converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 22.3% versus -0.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | INTC | MPWR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $113.12 | $1,425.98 |
| Market cap | $597.96B | $70.08B |
| 1-day change | +0.55% | -3.24% |
| YTD return | +205.75% | +57.68% |
| 1-year return | +203.52% | +51.16% |
| 5-year return | +107.16% | +197.10% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 86.74 |
| Forward P/E | 54.31 | 40.77 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-2.12 | $16.44 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.50% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $7.12 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $52.85B | $2.79B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -0.47% | +26.43% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-267.00M | $621.48M |
| Gross margin | 34.77% | 55.18% |
| Operating margin | -4.19% | 26.11% |
| Net margin | -0.51% | 22.27% |
| 52-week high | $142.35 | $1,714.09 |
| 52-week low | $32.89 | $833.18 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -20.53% | -16.81% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +4.36% | +29.02% |
| Average volume | 107.10M | 745.22K |
| Shares outstanding | 5.29B | 49.14M |
| Employees | 85,100 | 4,501 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Intel is about 8.5 times larger than Monolithic Power Systems by market value ($597.96B vs $70.08B).
- INTC has outperformed MPWR by 152.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Monolithic Power Systems is more profitable, keeping 22.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -0.5 cents for Intel.
- Monolithic Power Systems grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+26.43% vs -0.47%).
About Intel
INTC stock →Intel Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, markets, sells, and services computing and related end products and services in the United States, Ireland, Israel, and internationally. It operates through three segments: CCG, DCAI, and Intel Foundry.
Technology · Semiconductors · 85,100 employees
About Monolithic Power Systems
MPWR stock →Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. provides semiconductor-based power electronics solutions in China, Taiwan, South Korea, Southeast Asia, Europe, the United States, Japan, and internationally.
Technology · Semiconductors · 4,501 employees
INTC vs MPWR FAQ
Which is bigger, Intel or Monolithic Power Systems?
Intel (INTC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $597.96B compared with $70.08B for Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, INTC or MPWR?
INTC returned +203.52% over the past 12 months, compared with +51.16% for MPWR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Intel or Monolithic Power Systems?
Monolithic Power Systems pays a dividend yielding 0.50%, while Intel does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Intel and Monolithic Power Systems in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector.