Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) vs STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) has outperformed Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) over the past year, gaining 98.7% versus a gain of 51.2%. Over five years, MPWR leads with a +197.1% price change compared with +31.6% for STM. Monolithic Power Systems is the larger company by market cap ($70.08 billion vs $50.32 billion), about 1.4 times the size.
On valuation, STMicroelectronics N.V. trades at a lower forward P/E (22.1x vs 40.8x for Monolithic Power Systems). STMicroelectronics N.V. offers the higher dividend yield (0.64% vs 0.50%). Monolithic Power Systems converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 22.3% versus 1.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MPWR | STM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $1,425.98 | $56.18 |
| Market cap | $70.08B | $50.32B |
| 1-day change | -3.24% | -4.33% |
| YTD return | +57.68% | +115.67% |
| 1-year return | +51.16% | +98.67% |
| 5-year return | +197.10% | +31.57% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 86.74 | — |
| Forward P/E | 40.77 | 22.11 |
| EPS (TTM) | $16.44 | $0.04 |
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 0.64% |
| Annual dividend | $7.12 | $0.36 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.79B | $11.80B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +26.43% | -11.07% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $621.48M | $166.00M |
| Gross margin | 55.18% | 33.89% |
| Operating margin | 26.11% | 1.48% |
| Net margin | 22.27% | 1.41% |
| 52-week high | $1,714.09 | $81.42 |
| 52-week low | $833.18 | $21.11 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -16.81% | -31.00% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +29.02% | +33.57% |
| Average volume | 745.22K | 9.56M |
| Shares outstanding | 49.14M | 895.70M |
| Employees | 4,501 | 49,000 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- STM has outperformed MPWR by 47.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Monolithic Power Systems is more profitable, keeping 22.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.4 cents for STMicroelectronics N.V..
- Monolithic Power Systems grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+26.43% vs -11.07%).
About Monolithic Power Systems
MPWR stock →Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. provides semiconductor-based power electronics solutions in China, Taiwan, South Korea, Southeast Asia, Europe, the United States, Japan, and internationally.
Technology · Semiconductors · 4,501 employees
About STMicroelectronics N.V.
STM stock →STMicroelectronics N.V., together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, manufactures, and sells semiconductor products in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Americas, and the Asia Pacific. The company operates through Analog products, MEMS and Sensors Group (AM&S); Power and Discrete products (P&D); Embedded Processing (EMP); and RF Products (D&RF) segments.
Technology · Semiconductors · 49,000 employees
MPWR vs STM FAQ
Which is bigger, Monolithic Power Systems or STMicroelectronics N.V.?
Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $70.08B compared with $50.32B for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MPWR or STM?
STM returned +98.67% over the past 12 months, compared with +51.16% for MPWR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Monolithic Power Systems or STMicroelectronics N.V.?
STMicroelectronics N.V. has the higher yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.50% for Monolithic Power Systems.
Are Monolithic Power Systems and STMicroelectronics N.V. in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector.