MetaCap

IPG Photonics (IPGP) vs OSI Systems (OSIS)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

IPG Photonics (IPGP) has outperformed OSI Systems (OSIS) over the past year, losing 5.0% versus a loss of 22.2%. Over five years, OSIS leads with a +104.5% price change compared with -51.0% for IPGP. IPG Photonics is the larger company by market cap ($3.34 billion vs $3.11 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while OSI Systems is growing revenue faster (+4.3% vs +2.7%).

On valuation, OSI Systems trades at a lower forward P/E (15.2x vs 34.0x for IPG Photonics). OSI Systems converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.7% versus 3.1%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

IPGP-4.97%OSIS-22.19%
+86%+29%-28%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
IPGP-49.29%OSIS+99.58%
+233%+76%-82%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

IPGP versus OSIS key metrics
MetricIPGPOSIS
Share price$78.48$194.99
Market cap$3.34B$3.11B
1-day change-2.98%+0.48%
YTD return+12.97%-23.92%
1-year return-4.97%-22.19%
5-year return-51.00%+104.48%
P/E ratio (TTM)120.7421.79
Forward P/E34.0215.22
EPS (TTM)$0.65$8.95
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$1.00B$1.79B
Revenue growth (YoY)+2.73%+4.25%
Net income (latest FY)$31.10M$154.71M
Gross margin38.00%33.21%
Operating margin1.31%12.26%
Net margin3.10%8.66%
52-week high$155.82$311.72
52-week low$69.41$186.50
Distance from 52-week high-49.63%-37.45%
Analyst consensusbuystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+58.18%+42.72%
Average volume471.26K232.36K
Shares outstanding42.53M15.94M
Employees4,8407,806
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductors

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • IPGP has outperformed OSIS by 17.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • IPG Photonics trades at a higher earnings multiple (120.7x vs 21.8x trailing P/E).
  • OSI Systems is more profitable, keeping 8.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.1 cents for IPG Photonics.

About IPG Photonics

IPGP stock →

IPG Photonics Corporation develops, manufactures, and sells fiber lasers, fiber amplifiers, diode lasers, and laser-based systems used in materials processing, medical, and advanced applications. The company offers laser products, including hybrid fiber-solid state lasers with green and ultraviolet wavelengths; fiber pigtailed packaged diodes and fiber coupled direct diode laser systems; and high-energy pulsed lasers, multi-wavelength and tunable lasers, and single-polarization and single-frequency lasers, as well as other versions.

Technology · Semiconductors · 4,840 employees

About OSI Systems

OSIS stock →

OSI Systems, Inc. designs and manufactures specialized electronic systems and components for critical applications in the United States, Mexico, the rest of Americas, the United Kingdom, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific.

Technology · Semiconductors · 7,806 employees

IPGP vs OSIS FAQ

Which is bigger, IPG Photonics or OSI Systems?

IPG Photonics (IPGP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.34B compared with $3.11B for OSI Systems (OSIS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, IPGP or OSIS?

IPGP returned -4.97% over the past 12 months, compared with -22.19% for OSIS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, IPGP or OSIS?

OSIS has the lower trailing P/E at 21.8, versus 120.7 for IPGP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Are IPG Photonics and OSI Systems in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons