MetaCap

KLA (KLAC) vs TE Connectivity (TEL)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

KLA (KLAC) has outperformed TE Connectivity (TEL) over the past year, gaining 81.5% versus a loss of 2.8%. Over five years, KLAC leads with a +498.1% price change compared with +46.5% for TEL. KLA is the larger company by market cap ($256.86 billion vs $62.49 billion), about 4.1 times the size.

On valuation, TE Connectivity trades at a lower forward P/E (16.7x vs 29.4x for KLA). TE Connectivity offers the higher dividend yield (1.35% vs 0.41%). KLA converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 35.6% versus 10.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

KLAC+81.45%TEL-2.81%
+188%+83%-21%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
KLAC+503.68%TEL+48.16%
+732%+335%-62%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

KLAC versus TEL key metrics
MetricKLACTEL
Share price$196.83$215.83
Market cap$256.86B$62.49B
1-day change-0.32%-1.68%
YTD return+61.99%-5.13%
1-year return+81.45%-2.81%
5-year return+498.09%+46.52%
P/E ratio (TTM)53.7821.14
Forward P/E29.3516.71
EPS (TTM)$3.66$10.21
Dividend yield0.41%1.35%
Annual dividend$0.80$2.91
Revenue (latest FY)$13.58B$17.26B
Revenue growth (YoY)+11.71%+8.94%
Net income (latest FY)$4.83B$1.84B
Gross margin61.30%35.22%
Operating margin—18.60%
Net margin35.57%10.67%
52-week high$307.37$252.56
52-week low$98.10$190.27
Distance from 52-week high-35.96%-14.54%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+18.26%+15.56%
Average volume10.17M2.19M
Shares outstanding1.31B289.51M
Employees17,00090,000
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryElectronic ComponentsElectronic Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • KLA is about 4.1 times larger than TE Connectivity by market value ($256.86B vs $62.49B).
  • KLAC has outperformed TEL by 84.3 percentage points over the past year.
  • KLA trades at a higher earnings multiple (53.8x vs 21.1x trailing P/E).
  • KLA is more profitable, keeping 35.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 10.7 cents for TE Connectivity.

About KLA

KLAC stock →

KLA Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides process control and process-enabling solutions for manufacturing wafers, reticles/masks, chemicals/materials, integrated circuits (ICs), packaged ICs, and printed circuit boards. It operates through three segments: Semiconductor Process Control; Specialty Semiconductor Process; and PCB and Component Inspection.

Technology · Electronic Components · 17,000 employees

About TE Connectivity

TEL stock →

TE Connectivity plc, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and sells connectivity and sensor solutions in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia–Pacific, and the Americas. The company operates through two reportable segments, Transportation Solutions and Industrial Solutions.

Technology · Electronic Components · 90,000 employees

KLAC vs TEL FAQ

Which is bigger, KLA or TE Connectivity?

KLA (KLAC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $256.86B compared with $62.49B for TE Connectivity (TEL).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, KLAC or TEL?

KLAC returned +81.45% over the past 12 months, compared with -2.81% for TEL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, KLAC or TEL?

TEL has the lower trailing P/E at 21.1, versus 53.8 for KLAC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, KLA or TE Connectivity?

TE Connectivity has the higher yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.41% for KLA.

Are KLA and TE Connectivity in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Electronic Components industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons