MetaCap

Kulicke and Soffa Industries (KLIC) vs Synaptics (SYNA)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Kulicke and Soffa Industries (KLIC) has outperformed Synaptics (SYNA) over the past year, gaining 137.1% versus a gain of 82.0%. Over five years, KLIC leads with a +93.0% price change compared with -31.2% for SYNA. Kulicke and Soffa Industries is the larger company by market cap ($4.76 billion vs $4.73 billion), about 1.0 times the size, while Synaptics is growing revenue faster (+11.4% vs -7.4%).

On valuation, Kulicke and Soffa Industries trades at a lower forward P/E (15.4x vs 18.1x for Synaptics). Kulicke and Soffa Industries pays a dividend yielding 0.90%, while Synaptics does not currently pay one. Kulicke and Soffa Industries converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 0.0% versus -41.0%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

KLIC+137.08%SYNA+81.96%
+246%+111%-24%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
KLIC+80.10%SYNA-32.42%
+148%+32%-83%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

KLIC versus SYNA key metrics
MetricKLICSYNA
Share price$90.92$119.08
Market cap$4.76B$4.73B
1-day change-4.24%-0.32%
YTD return+108.41%+61.39%
1-year return+137.08%+81.96%
5-year return+92.99%-31.16%
P/E ratio (TTM)41.71—
Forward P/E15.4018.10
EPS (TTM)$2.18$-12.62
Dividend yield0.90%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.82$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$654.08M$1.20B
Revenue growth (YoY)-7.38%+11.44%
Net income (latest FY)$213.00K$-490.80M
Gross margin42.49%44.72%
Operating margin-0.49%-5.60%
Net margin0.03%-41.00%
52-week high$135.80$149.11
52-week low$35.02$58.28
Distance from 52-week high-33.05%-20.14%
Analyst consensusnonehold
Avg. price target upside+17.32%+8.61%
Average volume828.62K824.05K
Shares outstanding52.33M39.70M
Employees2,5511,700
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductors

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • KLIC has outperformed SYNA by 55.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • Kulicke and Soffa Industries is more profitable, keeping 0.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -41.0 cents for Synaptics.
  • Synaptics grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+11.44% vs -7.38%).

About Kulicke and Soffa Industries

KLIC stock →

Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells capital equipment and consumables in China, the United States, Taiwan, Malaysia, Japan, the Philippines, Korea, Hong Kong, and internationally.

Technology · Semiconductors · 2,551 employees

About Synaptics

SYNA stock →

Synaptics Incorporated develops, markets, and sells semiconductor products worldwide. The company provides edge AI processors, wireless connectivity, touch controllers, biometrics, voice, audio, and multimedia products for physical AI and robotics, edge AI, smart home, industrial and automotive, personal computers, and mobile applications, as well as modular development kits, open software frameworks, and optimized AI/ML toolchains.

Technology · Semiconductors · 1,700 employees

KLIC vs SYNA FAQ

Which is bigger, Kulicke and Soffa Industries or Synaptics?

Kulicke and Soffa Industries (KLIC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.76B compared with $4.73B for Synaptics (SYNA).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, KLIC or SYNA?

KLIC returned +137.08% over the past 12 months, compared with +81.96% for SYNA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which pays a higher dividend, Kulicke and Soffa Industries or Synaptics?

Kulicke and Soffa Industries pays a dividend yielding 0.90%, while Synaptics does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Kulicke and Soffa Industries and Synaptics in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons