Karman (KRMN) vs Loar (LOAR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Loar (LOAR) has outperformed Karman (KRMN) over the past year, losing 20.8% versus a loss of 58.3%. Loar is the larger company by market cap ($5.71 billion vs $4.16 billion), about 1.4 times the size, while Karman is growing revenue faster (+36.6% vs +23.2%). On valuation, Karman trades at a lower forward P/E (32.7x vs 37.8x for Loar).
Loar converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.5% versus 3.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | KRMN | LOAR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $31.39 | $61.00 |
| Market cap | $4.16B | $5.71B |
| 1-day change | -5.71% | -0.46% |
| YTD return | -57.10% | -10.29% |
| 1-year return | -58.26% | -20.76% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 112.11 | 85.92 |
| Forward P/E | 32.75 | 37.80 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.28 | $0.71 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $471.50M | $496.28M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +36.57% | +23.20% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $17.37M | $72.15M |
| Gross margin | 40.30% | 52.66% |
| Operating margin | 15.47% | 21.41% |
| Net margin | 3.68% | 14.54% |
| 52-week high | $118.38 | $83.43 |
| 52-week low | $30.97 | $53.15 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -73.48% | -26.88% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +180.98% | +47.21% |
| Average volume | 3.48M | 652.08K |
| Shares outstanding | 132.53M | 93.69M |
| Employees | 1,400 | 1,700 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Military/Government/Technical | Military/Government/Technical |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- LOAR has outperformed KRMN by 37.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Karman trades at a higher earnings multiple (112.1x vs 85.9x trailing P/E).
- Loar is more profitable, keeping 14.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.7 cents for Karman.
- Karman grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+36.57% vs +23.20%).
About Karman
KRMN stock →Karman Holdings Inc., through its subsidiary, engages in designing, testing, manufacturing, and sale of mission-critical systems in the United States. The company offers payload protection and deployment systems, aerodynamic interstage systems, and propulsion systems.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 1,400 employees
About Loar
LOAR stock →Loar Holdings Inc., through its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and sells aerospace and defense components for aircraft, and aerospace and defense systems in the United States and internationally. It offers airframe components, structural components, avionics, composites, braking system components, de-ice and ice protection, electro-mechanical, engineered materials, flight controls, fluid and motion controls, environmental, metal forming, molded components, and restraints and safety devices.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 1,700 employees
KRMN vs LOAR FAQ
Which is bigger, Karman or Loar?
Loar (LOAR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.71B compared with $4.16B for Karman (KRMN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, KRMN or LOAR?
LOAR returned -20.76% over the past 12 months, compared with -58.26% for KRMN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, KRMN or LOAR?
LOAR has the lower trailing P/E at 85.9, versus 112.1 for KRMN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Are Karman and Loar in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Military/Government/Technical industry within the Industrials sector.