MetaCap

LandBridge LLC (LB) vs Matador Resources (MTDR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

LandBridge LLC (LB) has outperformed Matador Resources (MTDR) over the past year, gaining 61.7% versus a gain of 19.6%. LandBridge LLC is the larger company by market cap ($6.85 billion vs $6.74 billion), about 1.0 times the size. On valuation, Matador Resources trades at a lower forward P/E (5.9x vs 37.6x for LandBridge LLC).

Matador Resources offers the higher dividend yield (2.64% vs 0.50%). Matador Resources converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 20.5% versus 15.1%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

LB+61.72%MTDR+19.63%
+70%+24%-23%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
LB+277.80%MTDR-11.33%
+304%+126%-52%
Jun 24, 20245 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

LB versus MTDR key metrics
MetricLBMTDR
Share price$87.46$54.48
Market cap$6.85B$6.74B
1-day change+2.03%+3.08%
YTD return+78.53%+28.37%
1-year return+61.72%+19.63%
5-year return—+27.04%
P/E ratio (TTM)77.409.34
Forward P/E37.645.95
EPS (TTM)$1.13$5.83
Dividend yield0.50%2.64%
Annual dividend$0.44$1.44
Revenue (latest FY)$199.09M$3.70B
Revenue growth (YoY)+81.07%+5.46%
Net income (latest FY)$30.13M$759.22M
Gross margin—94.37%
Operating margin59.52%33.18%
Net margin15.13%20.54%
52-week high$91.69$66.84
52-week low$43.75$37.14
Distance from 52-week high-4.61%-18.49%
Analyst consensusnonestrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+1.27%+28.30%
Average volume268.05K1.89M
Shares outstanding29.65M123.75M
Employees—483
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryOil & Gas ProductionOil & Gas Production

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • LB has outperformed MTDR by 42.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • LandBridge LLC trades at a higher earnings multiple (77.4x vs 9.3x trailing P/E).
  • Matador Resources offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.64% vs 0.50%).
  • Matador Resources is more profitable, keeping 20.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 15.1 cents for LandBridge LLC.
  • LandBridge LLC grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+81.07% vs +5.46%).

About LandBridge LLC

LB stock →

LandBridge Company LLC, together with its subsidiaries, owns and manages land and resources to support and enhance oil and natural gas development in the United States. It owns surface acres in and around the Delaware Basin in Texas and New Mexico.

Energy · Oil & Gas Production

About Matador Resources

MTDR stock →

Matador Resources Company, an independent energy company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas resources in the United States. It operates through two segments, Exploration and Production; and Midstream.

Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 483 employees

LB vs MTDR FAQ

Which is bigger, LandBridge LLC or Matador Resources?

LandBridge LLC (LB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.85B compared with $6.74B for Matador Resources (MTDR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, LB or MTDR?

LB returned +61.72% over the past 12 months, compared with +19.63% for MTDR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, LB or MTDR?

MTDR has the lower trailing P/E at 9.3, versus 77.4 for LB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, LandBridge LLC or Matador Resources?

Matador Resources has the higher yield at 2.64%, compared with 0.50% for LandBridge LLC.

Are LandBridge LLC and Matador Resources in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons