Littelfuse (LFUS) vs Sanmina (SANM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Sanmina (SANM) has outperformed Littelfuse (LFUS) over the past year, gaining 74.7% versus a gain of 70.8%. Over five years, SANM leads with a +455.2% price change compared with +54.8% for LFUS. Sanmina is the larger company by market cap ($11.76 billion vs $11.04 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Littelfuse is growing revenue faster (+8.9% vs +7.4%).
On valuation, Sanmina trades at a lower forward P/E (15.8x vs 21.6x for Littelfuse). Littelfuse pays a dividend yielding 0.69%, while Sanmina does not currently pay one. Sanmina converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 3.0% versus -3.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | LFUS | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $434.74 | $219.41 |
| Market cap | $11.04B | $11.76B |
| 1-day change | -4.30% | -3.80% |
| YTD return | +71.89% | +46.21% |
| 1-year return | +70.83% | +74.66% |
| 5-year return | +54.82% | +455.19% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 40.78 |
| Forward P/E | 21.64 | 15.77 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-0.50 | $5.38 |
| Dividend yield | 0.69% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $3.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.39B | $8.13B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.92% | +7.40% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-71.70M | $245.89M |
| Gross margin | 37.97% | 8.81% |
| Operating margin | 1.57% | 4.36% |
| Net margin | -3.00% | 3.03% |
| 52-week high | $500.57 | $288.68 |
| 52-week low | $233.36 | $118.10 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -13.15% | -24.00% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +12.42% | +18.50% |
| Average volume | 270.06K | 682.55K |
| Shares outstanding | 25.40M | 53.60M |
| Employees | 18,000 | 35,000 |
| Sector | Energy | Technology |
| Industry | Electrical Products | Electrical Products |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Sanmina is more profitable, keeping 3.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -3.0 cents for Littelfuse.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Littelfuse in Energy and Sanmina in Technology.
About Littelfuse
LFUS stock →Littelfuse, Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells electronic components, modules, and subassemblies.
Energy · Electrical Products · 18,000 employees
About Sanmina
SANM stock →Sanmina Corporation provides integrated manufacturing solutions, components, products and repair, logistics, and after-market services in the Americas, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company operates through two businesses: Integrated Manufacturing Solutions; and Components, Products and Services.
Technology · Electrical Products · 35,000 employees
LFUS vs SANM FAQ
Which is bigger, Littelfuse or Sanmina?
Sanmina (SANM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $11.76B compared with $11.04B for Littelfuse (LFUS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, LFUS or SANM?
SANM returned +74.66% over the past 12 months, compared with +70.83% for LFUS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Littelfuse or Sanmina?
Littelfuse pays a dividend yielding 0.69%, while Sanmina does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Littelfuse and Sanmina in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Electrical Products industry within the Energy sector.