MetaCap

Labcorp (LH) vs Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) has outperformed Labcorp (LH) over the past year, gaining 22.8% versus a gain of 11.6%. Over five years, LH leads with a +33.7% price change compared with +13.7% for TMO. Thermo Fisher Scientific is the larger company by market cap ($241.07 billion vs $25.48 billion), about 9.5 times the size, while Labcorp is growing revenue faster (+7.2% vs +3.9%).

On valuation, Labcorp trades at a lower forward P/E (15.9x vs 23.6x for Thermo Fisher Scientific). Labcorp offers the higher dividend yield (0.92% vs 0.28%). Thermo Fisher Scientific converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.0% versus 6.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

LH+11.57%TMO+22.79%
+28%+4%-21%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
LH+30.46%TMO+13.38%
+44%+4%-36%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

LH versus TMO key metrics
MetricLHTMO
Share price$314.20$651.98
Market cap$25.48B$241.07B
1-day change+0.71%-1.52%
YTD return+24.35%+14.26%
1-year return+11.57%+22.79%
5-year return+33.70%+13.68%
P/E ratio (TTM)25.9935.09
Forward P/E15.8623.64
EPS (TTM)$12.09$18.58
Dividend yield0.92%0.28%
Annual dividend$2.88$1.80
Revenue (latest FY)$13.95B$44.56B
Revenue growth (YoY)+7.25%+3.91%
Net income (latest FY)$876.50M$6.70B
Gross margin28.76%—
Operating margin9.92%17.38%
Net margin6.28%15.05%
52-week high$341.80$694.33
52-week low$244.52$435.27
Distance from 52-week high-8.07%-6.10%
Analyst consensusbuystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+9.54%+2.02%
Average volume737.41K2.07M
Shares outstanding81.10M369.75M
Employees71,000125,000
SectorHealth CareIndustrials
IndustryMedical SpecialitiesIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Thermo Fisher Scientific is about 9.5 times larger than Labcorp by market value ($241.07B vs $25.48B).
  • TMO has outperformed LH by 11.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific trades at a higher earnings multiple (35.1x vs 26.0x trailing P/E).
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific is more profitable, keeping 15.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 6.3 cents for Labcorp.
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Labcorp in Health Care and Thermo Fisher Scientific in Industrials.

About Labcorp

LH stock →

Labcorp Holdings Inc. provides laboratory services.

Health Care · Medical Specialities · 71,000 employees

About Thermo Fisher Scientific

TMO stock →

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. provides life sciences solutions, analytical instruments, specialty diagnostics, and laboratory products and biopharma services internationally.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 125,000 employees

LH vs TMO FAQ

Which is bigger, Labcorp or Thermo Fisher Scientific?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $241.07B compared with $25.48B for Labcorp (LH).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, LH or TMO?

TMO returned +22.79% over the past 12 months, compared with +11.57% for LH (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, LH or TMO?

LH has the lower trailing P/E at 26.0, versus 35.1 for TMO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Labcorp or Thermo Fisher Scientific?

Labcorp has the higher yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.28% for Thermo Fisher Scientific.

Are Labcorp and Thermo Fisher Scientific in the same industry?

No. Labcorp is in the Health Care sector, while Thermo Fisher Scientific is in Industrials.

More comparisons