MetaCap

LPL Financial (LPLA) vs Nasdaq (NDAQ)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Nasdaq (NDAQ) has outperformed LPL Financial (LPLA) over the past year, gaining 2.8% versus a gain of 0.9%. Over five years, LPLA leads with a +90.1% price change compared with +36.5% for NDAQ. Nasdaq is the larger company by market cap ($52.26 billion vs $26.28 billion), about 2.0 times the size, while LPL Financial is growing revenue faster (+37.2% vs +11.6%).

On valuation, LPL Financial trades at a lower forward P/E (11.1x vs 20.0x for Nasdaq). Nasdaq offers the higher dividend yield (1.20% vs 0.36%). Nasdaq converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 21.6% versus 5.1%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

LPLA+0.88%NDAQ+2.78%
+23%+1%-20%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
LPLA+96.11%NDAQ+40.38%
+143%+54%-36%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

LPLA versus NDAQ key metrics
MetricLPLANDAQ
Share price$333.72$93.50
Market cap$26.28B$52.26B
1-day change+1.74%+1.22%
YTD return-8.17%-4.90%
1-year return+0.88%+2.78%
5-year return+90.14%+36.49%
P/E ratio (TTM)26.5527.26
Forward P/E11.0520.01
EPS (TTM)$12.57$3.43
Dividend yield0.36%1.20%
Annual dividend$1.20$1.12
Revenue (latest FY)$16.99B$8.26B
Revenue growth (YoY)+37.18%+11.65%
Net income (latest FY)$863.02M$1.79B
Gross margin—63.53%
Operating margin—28.21%
Net margin5.08%21.64%
52-week high$400.16$101.79
52-week low$260.15$76.55
Distance from 52-week high-16.60%-8.14%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+26.87%+16.64%
Average volume727.78K3.28M
Shares outstanding78.74M558.98M
Employees10,0819,630
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment Bankers/Brokers/ServiceInvestment Bankers/Brokers/Service

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Nasdaq is more profitable, keeping 21.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 5.1 cents for LPL Financial.
  • LPL Financial grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+37.18% vs +11.65%).

About LPL Financial

LPLA stock →

LPL Financial Holdings Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides an integrated platform of brokerage and investment advisory services to independent financial advisors and financial advisors at institutions in the United States. The company's brokerage offerings include variable and fixed annuities, mutual funds, equities, fixed income, alternative investments, retirement and 529 education savings plans, and insurance; and client cash programs consist of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured bank sweep vehicles, and a client cash and money market account.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 10,081 employees

About Nasdaq

NDAQ stock →

Nasdaq, Inc. operates as a technology company that serves capital markets and other industries in the United States and internationally.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 9,630 employees

LPLA vs NDAQ FAQ

Which is bigger, LPL Financial or Nasdaq?

Nasdaq (NDAQ) is larger, with a market capitalization of $52.26B compared with $26.28B for LPL Financial (LPLA).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, LPLA or NDAQ?

NDAQ returned +2.78% over the past 12 months, compared with +0.88% for LPLA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, LPLA or NDAQ?

LPLA has the lower trailing P/E at 26.5, versus 27.3 for NDAQ. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, LPL Financial or Nasdaq?

Nasdaq has the higher yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.36% for LPL Financial.

Are LPL Financial and Nasdaq in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons