MetaCap

Leishen Energy (LSE) vs USA Compression Partners (USAC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

USA Compression Partners (USAC) has outperformed Leishen Energy (LSE) over the past year, gaining 6.8% versus a loss of 11.3%. USA Compression Partners is the larger company by market cap ($3.68 billion vs $80.0 million), about 46.0 times the size. On valuation, USA Compression Partners trades at a lower trailing P/E (23.9x vs 470.1x for Leishen Energy).

USA Compression Partners pays a dividend yielding 8.27%, while Leishen Energy does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

LSE-11.31%USAC+6.82%
+31%-6%-43%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
LSE-5.61%USAC+17.83%
+73%+24%-25%
Dec 16, 20245 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

LSE versus USAC key metrics
MetricLSEUSAC
Share price$4.70$25.38
Market cap$80.03M$3.68B
1-day change+4.46%-0.55%
YTD return+7.56%+10.35%
1-year return-11.31%+6.82%
5-year return—+44.78%
P/E ratio (TTM)470.0523.94
Forward P/E—15.25
EPS (TTM)$0.01$1.06
Dividend yield0.00%8.27%
Annual dividend$0.00$2.10
52-week high$6.98$30.55
52-week low$3.20$21.85
Distance from 52-week high-32.66%-16.92%
Analyst consensus—none
Avg. price target upside—+18.20%
Average volume6.41K328.06K
Shares outstanding4.32M144.94M
Employees—885
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • USA Compression Partners is about 46.0 times larger than Leishen Energy by market value ($3.68B vs $80.03M).
  • USAC has outperformed LSE by 18.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • Leishen Energy trades at a higher earnings multiple (470.1x vs 23.9x trailing P/E).
  • USA Compression Partners offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (8.27% vs 0.00%).

About Leishen Energy

LSE stock →

Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd., through its subsidiaries, provides clean-energy equipment and integrated solutions for the oil and gas industry in the People's Republic of China, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia. It operates through four segments: Clean-Energy Equipment; New Energy Production and Operation; Digitalization and Integration Equipment; and Oil and Gas Engineering Technical Services.

Energy · Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

About USA Compression Partners

USAC stock →

USA Compression Partners, LP provides natural gas compression services in the United States. The company offers compression services to oil companies and independent producers, processors, gatherers, and transporters of natural gas and crude oil, as well as for infrastructure applications, including centralized natural gas gathering systems and processing facilities, and gas lift applications in crude oil wells.

Energy · Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · 885 employees

LSE vs USAC FAQ

Which is bigger, Leishen Energy or USA Compression Partners?

USA Compression Partners (USAC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.68B compared with $80.03M for Leishen Energy (LSE).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, LSE or USAC?

USAC returned +6.82% over the past 12 months, compared with -11.31% for LSE (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, LSE or USAC?

USAC has the lower trailing P/E at 23.9, versus 470.1 for LSE. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Leishen Energy or USA Compression Partners?

USA Compression Partners pays a dividend yielding 8.27%, while Leishen Energy does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Leishen Energy and USA Compression Partners in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons