MetLife (MET) vs Prudential Financial (PRU)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
MetLife (MET) has outperformed Prudential Financial (PRU) over the past year, gaining 15.5% versus a gain of 7.7%. Over five years, MET leads with a +45.8% price change compared with +1.0% for PRU. MetLife is the larger company by market cap ($60.87 billion vs $38.76 billion), about 1.6 times the size.
On valuation, Prudential Financial trades at a lower forward P/E (7.6x vs 8.6x for MetLife). Prudential Financial offers the higher dividend yield (4.89% vs 2.40%). Prudential Financial converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 5.9% versus 4.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MET | PRU |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $95.78 | $112.36 |
| Market cap | $60.87B | $38.76B |
| 1-day change | -1.42% | -1.04% |
| YTD return | +21.07% | -1.06% |
| 1-year return | +15.49% | +7.68% |
| 5-year return | +45.75% | +0.99% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 18.28 | 10.18 |
| Forward P/E | 8.61 | 7.56 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.24 | $11.04 |
| Dividend yield | 2.40% | 4.89% |
| Annual dividend | $2.30 | $5.50 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $77.08B | $60.77B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.59% | -13.68% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $3.38B | $3.58B |
| Operating margin | 7.96% | — |
| Net margin | 4.38% | 5.88% |
| 52-week high | $100.93 | $127.72 |
| 52-week low | $67.33 | $91.89 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -5.10% | -12.03% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +12.11% | +1.17% |
| Average volume | 3.38M | 1.71M |
| Shares outstanding | 635.48M | 345.00M |
| Employees | 46,000 | 36,607 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Life Insurance | Life Insurance |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MetLife trades at a higher earnings multiple (18.3x vs 10.2x trailing P/E).
- Prudential Financial offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.89% vs 2.40%).
- MetLife grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+8.59% vs -13.68%).
About MetLife
MET stock →MetLife, Inc., a financial services company, provides insurance, annuities, employee benefits, and asset management services worldwide. It operates in six segments: Group Benefits; Retirement and Income Solutions; Asia; Latin America; Europe, the Middle East and Africa; and MetLife Holdings.
Finance · Life Insurance · 46,000 employees
About Prudential Financial
PRU stock →Prudential Financial, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides financial products and services in the United States, Japan and internationally. It operates through PGIM, Retirement Strategies, Group Insurance, Individual Life, and International Businesses segments.
Finance · Life Insurance · 36,607 employees
MET vs PRU FAQ
Which is bigger, MetLife or Prudential Financial?
MetLife (MET) is larger, with a market capitalization of $60.87B compared with $38.76B for Prudential Financial (PRU).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MET or PRU?
MET returned +15.49% over the past 12 months, compared with +7.68% for PRU (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MET or PRU?
PRU has the lower trailing P/E at 10.2, versus 18.3 for MET. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, MetLife or Prudential Financial?
Prudential Financial has the higher yield at 4.89%, compared with 2.40% for MetLife.
Are MetLife and Prudential Financial in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Life Insurance industry within the Finance sector.