MetaCap

mF International (MFI) vs Rimini Street (DE) (RMNI)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Rimini Street (DE) (RMNI) has outperformed mF International (MFI) over the past year, losing 10.6% versus a loss of 74.8%. mF International is the larger company by market cap ($466.6 million vs $382.3 million), about 1.2 times the size. On valuation, mF International trades at a lower trailing P/E (4.4x vs 58.5x for Rimini Street (DE)).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

MFI-74.77%RMNI-9.27%
+30%-29%-89%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 6, 2026
MFI-50.11%RMNI+46.25%
+147%+30%-87%
Apr 22, 20245 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

MFI versus RMNI key metrics
MetricMFIRMNI
Share price$9.30$4.10
Market cap$466.64M$382.29M
1-day change0.00%+0.86%
YTD return-49.95%+5.54%
1-year return-74.77%-10.59%
5-year return—-58.26%
P/E ratio (TTM)4.4358.50
Forward P/E—8.53
EPS (TTM)$2.10$0.07
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
52-week high$43.58$5.68
52-week low$5.56$2.87
Distance from 52-week high-78.66%-27.90%
Analyst consensusnonenone
Avg. price target upside+50.54%+70.94%
Average volume14.33K407.99K
Shares outstanding49.05M93.36M
Employees331,980
SectorTechnologyConsumer Discretionary
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationBusiness Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • RMNI has outperformed MFI by 64.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • Rimini Street (DE) trades at a higher earnings multiple (58.5x vs 4.4x trailing P/E).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: mF International in Technology and Rimini Street (DE) in Consumer Discretionary.

About mF International

MFI stock →

mF International Limited provides financial trading solutions through the internet or software-as-a-service platforms in Hong Kong, Mainland China, and Southeast Asia. The company offers the m-FINANCE Trading Platform, a trading solution; a customer relationship management system (CRM) for facilitating forex and bullion brokerage companies to manage introducing brokers and clients; liquidity solutions for fully automatic hedging and sending clients' orders directly to liquidity providers; white label services; CopyMaster, a mobile application for social and copy trading; Broker+, a cross-platform solution that provides brokers the flexibility to operate as liquidity providers; and other financial value-added services, such as interactive charts, professional trading analysis and strategies, economic calendar, instant financial news, real-time quotes, online payment gateways, mobile customer relationship management system (mCRM), and website development.

Technology · Software - Application · 33 employees

About Rimini Street (DE)

RMNI stock →

Rimini Street, Inc. provides enterprise software support, managed services, and Agentic AI ERP solutions.

Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 1,980 employees

MFI vs RMNI FAQ

Which is bigger, mF International or Rimini Street (DE)?

mF International (MFI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $466.64M compared with $382.29M for Rimini Street (DE) (RMNI).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, MFI or RMNI?

RMNI returned -10.59% over the past 12 months, compared with -74.77% for MFI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, MFI or RMNI?

MFI has the lower trailing P/E at 4.4, versus 58.5 for RMNI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Are mF International and Rimini Street (DE) in the same industry?

No. mF International is in the Technology sector, while Rimini Street (DE) is in Consumer Discretionary.

More comparisons