Mistras Group (MG) vs Park Aerospace (PKE)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Mistras Group (MG) has outperformed Park Aerospace (PKE) over the past year, gaining 116.1% versus a gain of 46.7%. Over five years, PKE leads with a +116.6% price change compared with +116.4% for MG. Mistras Group is the larger company by market cap ($665.2 million vs $636.4 million), about 1.0 times the size.
On valuation, Mistras Group trades at a lower forward P/E (16.5x vs 57.4x for Park Aerospace). Park Aerospace pays a dividend yielding 1.71%, while Mistras Group does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MG | PKE |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $20.88 | $29.26 |
| Market cap | $665.24M | $636.44M |
| 1-day change | -0.71% | -2.66% |
| YTD return | +65.06% | +37.11% |
| 1-year return | +116.15% | +46.67% |
| 5-year return | +116.37% | +116.58% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 25.16 | 46.44 |
| Forward P/E | 16.51 | 57.37 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.83 | $0.63 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.71% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.50 |
| 52-week high | $21.77 | $39.86 |
| 52-week low | $9.37 | $18.25 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -4.09% | -26.59% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +10.15% | +45.25% |
| Average volume | 305.77K | 257.19K |
| Shares outstanding | 31.86M | 21.75M |
| Employees | 4,800 | 125 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Industrials |
| Industry | Military/Government/Technical | Military/Government/Technical |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MG has outperformed PKE by 69.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Park Aerospace trades at a higher earnings multiple (46.4x vs 25.2x trailing P/E).
- Park Aerospace offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.71% vs 0.00%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Mistras Group in Consumer Discretionary and Park Aerospace in Industrials.
About Mistras Group
MG stock →Mistras Group, Inc. provides technology-enabled industrial asset integrity and laboratory testing solutions in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and South America.
Consumer Discretionary · Military/Government/Technical · 4,800 employees
About Park Aerospace
PKE stock →Park Aerospace Corp., an aerospace company, develops and manufactures solution and hot-melt advanced composite materials used to produce composite structures for the aerospace market in North America, Asia, and Europe. It offers advanced composite materials, including film adhesives and lightning strike protection materials used to produce primary and secondary structures for jet engines, large and regional transport aircraft, military aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles, business jets, general aviation aircraft, and rotary wing aircraft.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 125 employees
MG vs PKE FAQ
Which is bigger, Mistras Group or Park Aerospace?
Mistras Group (MG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $665.24M compared with $636.44M for Park Aerospace (PKE).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MG or PKE?
MG returned +116.15% over the past 12 months, compared with +46.67% for PKE (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MG or PKE?
MG has the lower trailing P/E at 25.2, versus 46.4 for PKE. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Mistras Group or Park Aerospace?
Park Aerospace pays a dividend yielding 1.71%, while Mistras Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Mistras Group and Park Aerospace in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Military/Government/Technical industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.