MetaCap

Middleby (MIDD) vs Sensata Technologies (ST)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Sensata Technologies (ST) has outperformed Middleby (MIDD) over the past year, gaining 38.8% versus a loss of 4.8%. Over five years, MIDD leads with a -24.0% price change compared with -27.4% for ST. Sensata Technologies is the larger company by market cap ($6.10 billion vs $4.73 billion), about 1.3 times the size, while Middleby is growing revenue faster (+1.6% vs -5.8%).

On valuation, Sensata Technologies trades at a lower forward P/E (10.2x vs 13.4x for Middleby). Sensata Technologies pays a dividend yielding 1.15%, while Middleby does not currently pay one. Sensata Technologies converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 0.8% versus -8.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

MIDD-4.75%ST+38.78%
+80%+28%-23%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
MIDD-23.54%ST-25.73%
+19%-26%-71%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

MIDD versus ST key metrics
MetricMIDDST
Share price$104.52$41.90
Market cap$4.73B$6.10B
1-day change-0.68%-1.11%
YTD return-12.01%+27.28%
1-year return-4.75%+38.78%
5-year return-24.03%-27.41%
P/E ratio (TTM)—69.83
Forward P/E13.4110.23
EPS (TTM)$-5.42$0.60
Dividend yield0.00%1.15%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.48
Revenue (latest FY)$3.20B$3.70B
Revenue growth (YoY)+1.62%-5.81%
Net income (latest FY)$-277.73M$31.30M
Gross margin39.11%29.27%
Operating margin17.96%6.41%
Net margin-8.68%0.84%
52-week high$148.55$53.89
52-week low$89.16$28.16
Distance from 52-week high-29.64%-22.25%
Analyst consensusnonenone
Avg. price target upside+49.15%+26.49%
Average volume591.81K1.45M
Shares outstanding45.22M145.54M
Employees8,82616,700
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ST has outperformed MIDD by 43.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • Sensata Technologies offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.15% vs 0.00%).
  • Sensata Technologies is more profitable, keeping 0.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -8.7 cents for Middleby.
  • Middleby grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+1.62% vs -5.81%).

About Middleby

MIDD stock →

The Middleby Corporation operates in the foodservice industry worldwide. The company develops and manufactures a line of solutions used in commercial foodservice and food processing.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 8,826 employees

About Sensata Technologies

ST stock →

Sensata Technologies Holding plc develops, manufactures, and sells sensors and sensor-rich solutions, electrical protection components and systems, and other products used in mission-critical systems and applications in the United States, Europe, Asia, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Automotive; Industrials; and Aerospace, Defense, and Commercial Equipment.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 16,700 employees

MIDD vs ST FAQ

Which is bigger, Middleby or Sensata Technologies?

Sensata Technologies (ST) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.10B compared with $4.73B for Middleby (MIDD).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, MIDD or ST?

ST returned +38.78% over the past 12 months, compared with -4.75% for MIDD (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which pays a higher dividend, Middleby or Sensata Technologies?

Sensata Technologies pays a dividend yielding 1.15%, while Middleby does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Middleby and Sensata Technologies in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons