MKS (MKSI) vs Stanley Black & Decker (SWK)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 21, 2026.
Summary
MKS (MKSI) has outperformed Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) over the past year, gaining 53.6% versus a gain of 34.7%. Over five years, MKSI leads with a +44.0% price change compared with -46.9% for SWK. MKS is the larger company by market cap ($14.61 billion vs $14.41 billion), about 1.0 times the size.
On valuation, MKS trades at a lower forward P/E (12.3x vs 15.1x for Stanley Black & Decker). Stanley Black & Decker offers the higher dividend yield (3.48% vs 0.43%). MKS converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.5% versus 2.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MKSI | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $216.10 | $95.44 |
| Market cap | $14.61B | $14.41B |
| 1-day change | +2.35% | +1.43% |
| YTD return | +35.23% | +28.49% |
| 1-year return | +53.56% | +34.69% |
| 5-year return | +44.02% | -46.90% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 33.56 | 23.00 |
| Forward P/E | 12.29 | 15.13 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.44 | $4.15 |
| Dividend yield | 0.43% | 3.48% |
| Annual dividend | $0.94 | $3.32 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.93B | $15.13B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.62% | -1.53% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $295.00M | $401.90M |
| Gross margin | 46.73% | 30.33% |
| Operating margin | 13.43% | — |
| Net margin | 7.50% | 2.66% |
| 52-week high | $447.62 | $104.68 |
| 52-week low | $132.28 | $61.90 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -51.72% | -8.83% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +88.80% | +5.92% |
| Average volume | 1.39M | 1.77M |
| Shares outstanding | 67.62M | 151.02M |
| Employees | 10,200 | 41,000 |
| Sector | Industrials | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MKSI has outperformed SWK by 18.9 percentage points over the past year.
- MKS trades at a higher earnings multiple (33.6x vs 23.0x trailing P/E).
- Stanley Black & Decker offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.48% vs 0.43%).
- MKS grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+9.62% vs -1.53%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: MKS in Industrials and Stanley Black & Decker in Consumer Discretionary.
About MKS
MKSI stock →MKS Inc. provides foundational technology solutions to semiconductor manufacturing, electronics and packaging, and specialty industrial applications in the United States, China, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, and internationally.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 10,200 employees
About Stanley Black & Decker
SWK stock →Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. provides hand tools, power tools, outdoor products, and related accessories in the United States, Canada, Other Americas, Europe, and Asia.
Consumer Discretionary · Industrial Machinery/Components · 41,000 employees
MKSI vs SWK FAQ
Which is bigger, MKS or Stanley Black & Decker?
MKS (MKSI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.61B compared with $14.41B for Stanley Black & Decker (SWK).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MKSI or SWK?
MKSI returned +53.56% over the past 12 months, compared with +34.69% for SWK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MKSI or SWK?
SWK has the lower trailing P/E at 23.0, versus 33.6 for MKSI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, MKS or Stanley Black & Decker?
Stanley Black & Decker has the higher yield at 3.48%, compared with 0.43% for MKS.
Are MKS and Stanley Black & Decker in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.