MillerKnoll (MLKN) vs Pitney Bowes (PBI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Pitney Bowes (PBI) has outperformed MillerKnoll (MLKN) over the past year, gaining 49.7% versus a gain of 25.0%. Over five years, PBI leads with a +132.1% price change compared with -45.7% for MLKN. Pitney Bowes is the larger company by market cap ($2.26 billion vs $1.42 billion), about 1.6 times the size.
On valuation, Pitney Bowes trades at a lower forward P/E (9.0x vs 9.1x for MillerKnoll). MillerKnoll offers the higher dividend yield (3.63% vs 2.18%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MLKN | PBI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $20.65 | $16.48 |
| Market cap | $1.42B | $2.26B |
| 1-day change | -0.34% | -0.48% |
| YTD return | +12.96% | +55.91% |
| 1-year return | +25.00% | +49.68% |
| 5-year return | -45.72% | +132.11% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 14.65 | 13.40 |
| Forward P/E | 9.09 | 9.05 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.41 | $1.23 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 2.18% |
| Annual dividend | $0.75 | $0.36 |
| 52-week high | $24.71 | $19.07 |
| 52-week low | $13.77 | $8.95 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -16.43% | -13.58% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +52.54% | +18.69% |
| Average volume | 652.02K | 1.69M |
| Shares outstanding | 68.80M | 137.09M |
| Employees | 10,544 | 6,600 |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Miscellaneous |
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Office Equipment/Supplies/Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PBI has outperformed MLKN by 24.7 percentage points over the past year.
- MillerKnoll offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.63% vs 2.18%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: MillerKnoll in Consumer Cyclical and Pitney Bowes in Miscellaneous.
About MillerKnoll
MLKN stock →MillerKnoll, Inc. researches, designs, manufactures, sells, and distributes interior furnishings worldwide.
Consumer Cyclical · Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances · 10,544 employees
About Pitney Bowes
PBI stock →Pitney Bowes Inc. provides digital shipping solutions, mailing innovation, and financial services worldwide.
Miscellaneous · Office Equipment/Supplies/Services · 6,600 employees
MLKN vs PBI FAQ
Which is bigger, MillerKnoll or Pitney Bowes?
Pitney Bowes (PBI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.26B compared with $1.42B for MillerKnoll (MLKN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MLKN or PBI?
PBI returned +49.68% over the past 12 months, compared with +25.00% for MLKN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MLKN or PBI?
PBI has the lower trailing P/E at 13.4, versus 14.6 for MLKN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, MillerKnoll or Pitney Bowes?
MillerKnoll has the higher yield at 3.63%, compared with 2.18% for Pitney Bowes.
Are MillerKnoll and Pitney Bowes in the same industry?
No. MillerKnoll is in the Consumer Cyclical sector, while Pitney Bowes is in Miscellaneous.