MetaCap

Mosaic (MOS) vs Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG) has outperformed Mosaic (MOS) over the past year, losing 14.6% versus a loss of 43.3%. Over five years, MOS leads with a -52.4% price change compared with -66.0% for SMG. Mosaic is the larger company by market cap ($6.27 billion vs $2.94 billion), about 2.1 times the size.

On valuation, Scotts Miracle-Gro trades at a lower forward P/E (10.7x vs 12.5x for Mosaic). Scotts Miracle-Gro offers the higher dividend yield (5.23% vs 4.46%). Mosaic converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 4.5% versus 4.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

MOS-43.29%SMG-14.57%
+28%-9%-47%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
MOS-51.16%SMG-65.69%
+96%+8%-80%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

MOS versus SMG key metrics
MetricMOSSMG
Share price$19.73$50.43
Market cap$6.27B$2.94B
1-day change-1.20%+2.09%
YTD return-18.10%-13.57%
1-year return-43.29%-14.57%
5-year return-52.42%-66.01%
P/E ratio (TTM)—18.01
Forward P/E12.5110.72
EPS (TTM)$-2.01$2.80
Dividend yield4.46%5.23%
Annual dividend$0.88$2.64
Revenue (latest FY)$12.05B$3.41B
Revenue growth (YoY)+8.36%-3.93%
Net income (latest FY)$540.70M$145.20M
Gross margin15.78%30.59%
Operating margin6.82%10.51%
Net margin4.49%4.25%
52-week high$32.25$75.34
52-week low$19.63$47.90
Distance from 52-week high-38.82%-33.06%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+35.12%+47.08%
Average volume8.10M1.02M
Shares outstanding317.90M58.22M
Employees13,0005,200
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryAgricultural ChemicalsAgricultural Chemicals

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Mosaic is about 2.1 times larger than Scotts Miracle-Gro by market value ($6.27B vs $2.94B).
  • SMG has outperformed MOS by 28.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Mosaic grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+8.36% vs -3.93%).

About Mosaic

MOS stock →

The Mosaic Company, through its subsidiaries, produces and markets concentrated phosphate and potash crop nutrients. It operates in three segments: Phosphates, Potash, and Mosaic Fertilizantes.

Industrials · Agricultural Chemicals · 13,000 employees

About Scotts Miracle-Gro

SMG stock →

The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the manufacture, marketing, and sale of products for lawn, garden care, and indoor and hydroponic gardening in the United States and internationally. The company provides lawn care products, comprising lawn fertilizers, clover and grass seed products, spreaders, and other durable products, as well as lawn-related weed, pest, and disease control products; and gardening and landscape products, which include water-soluble and continuous-release plant foods, potting mixes, garden soils, mulches and ground cover products, plant-related pest and disease control products, organic garden products, and live goods and seeding solutions.

Industrials · Agricultural Chemicals · 5,200 employees

MOS vs SMG FAQ

Which is bigger, Mosaic or Scotts Miracle-Gro?

Mosaic (MOS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.27B compared with $2.94B for Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, MOS or SMG?

SMG returned -14.57% over the past 12 months, compared with -43.29% for MOS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which pays a higher dividend, Mosaic or Scotts Miracle-Gro?

Scotts Miracle-Gro has the higher yield at 5.23%, compared with 4.46% for Mosaic.

Are Mosaic and Scotts Miracle-Gro in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Agricultural Chemicals industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons