MACOM Technology Solutions (MTSI) vs Qnity Electronics (Q)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Qnity Electronics is the larger company by market cap ($26.50 billion vs $24.61 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while MACOM Technology Solutions is growing revenue faster (+32.6% vs +9.7%). On valuation, Qnity Electronics trades at a lower forward P/E (23.6x vs 38.0x for MACOM Technology Solutions). Qnity Electronics pays a dividend yielding 0.17%, while MACOM Technology Solutions does not currently pay one.
Qnity Electronics converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.3% versus -5.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MTSI | Q |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $322.21 | $126.68 |
| Market cap | $24.61B | $26.50B |
| 1-day change | -4.08% | -2.34% |
| YTD return | +96.12% | +58.87% |
| 1-year return | +162.49% | — |
| 5-year return | +422.49% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 102.61 | 45.24 |
| Forward P/E | 37.95 | 23.55 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.14 | $2.80 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.17% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.22 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $967.26M | $4.75B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +32.58% | +9.67% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-54.21M | $729.00M |
| Gross margin | 54.69% | 46.17% |
| Operating margin | 13.40% | — |
| Net margin | -5.60% | 15.33% |
| 52-week high | $418.90 | $177.28 |
| 52-week low | $121.97 | $70.50 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -23.08% | -28.54% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.69% | +37.55% |
| Average volume | 1.36M | 1.70M |
| Shares outstanding | 76.37M | 209.21M |
| Employees | 2,000 | 10,000 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MACOM Technology Solutions trades at a higher earnings multiple (102.6x vs 45.2x trailing P/E).
- Qnity Electronics is more profitable, keeping 15.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -5.6 cents for MACOM Technology Solutions.
- MACOM Technology Solutions grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+32.58% vs +9.67%).
About MACOM Technology Solutions
MTSI stock →MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides analog semiconductor solutions for use in wireless and wireline applications across the radio frequency (RF), microwave, millimeter wave, and lightwave spectrum. The company offers a portfolio of standard and custom devices, including integrated circuits, multi-chip modules, diodes, amplifiers, switches and switch limiters, passive and active components, and subsystems.
Technology · Semiconductors · 2,000 employees
About Qnity Electronics
Q stock →Qnity Electronics, Inc. provides materials and solutions to the semiconductor and electronics industries in the United States, rest of Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific, China, South Korea, Taiwan, and internationally.
Technology · Semiconductors · 10,000 employees
MTSI vs Q FAQ
Which is bigger, MACOM Technology Solutions or Qnity Electronics?
Qnity Electronics (Q) is larger, with a market capitalization of $26.50B compared with $24.61B for MACOM Technology Solutions (MTSI).
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MTSI or Q?
Q has the lower trailing P/E at 45.2, versus 102.6 for MTSI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, MACOM Technology Solutions or Qnity Electronics?
Qnity Electronics pays a dividend yielding 0.17%, while MACOM Technology Solutions does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are MACOM Technology Solutions and Qnity Electronics in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector.