MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS (MWA) vs Enpro (NPO)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Enpro (NPO) has outperformed MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS (MWA) over the past year, gaining 42.1% versus a loss of 13.8%. Over five years, NPO leads with a +256.4% price change compared with +36.2% for MWA. Enpro is the larger company by market cap ($6.59 billion vs $3.38 billion), about 1.9 times the size.
On valuation, MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS trades at a lower forward P/E (13.7x vs 28.6x for Enpro). MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS offers the higher dividend yield (1.28% vs 0.40%). MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.4% versus 3.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MWA | NPO |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $21.67 | $311.45 |
| Market cap | $3.38B | $6.59B |
| 1-day change | +0.51% | +1.23% |
| YTD return | -9.03% | +45.45% |
| 1-year return | -13.80% | +42.08% |
| 5-year return | +36.20% | +256.39% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 15.15 | 151.19 |
| Forward P/E | 13.66 | 28.61 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.43 | $2.06 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 0.40% |
| Annual dividend | $0.277 | $1.26 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.43B | $1.14B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.75% | +9.02% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $191.70M | $40.50M |
| Gross margin | 36.14% | 42.64% |
| Operating margin | 18.23% | 14.13% |
| Net margin | 13.41% | 3.54% |
| 52-week high | $31.00 | $390.42 |
| 52-week low | $20.90 | $202.00 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -30.10% | -20.23% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +32.30% | +25.06% |
| Average volume | 1.25M | 183.61K |
| Shares outstanding | 156.13M | 21.17M |
| Employees | 3,500 | 4,000 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Metal Fabrications | Metal Fabrications |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- NPO has outperformed MWA by 55.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Enpro trades at a higher earnings multiple (151.2x vs 15.2x trailing P/E).
- MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS is more profitable, keeping 13.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.5 cents for Enpro.
About MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS
MWA stock →Mueller Water Products, Inc. manufactures and markets products and services for the transmission, distribution, and measurement of water used by municipalities, and the residential and non-residential construction industries in the United States, Canada, and internationally.
Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 3,500 employees
About Enpro
NPO stock →Enpro Inc., an industrial technology company, design, develops, manufactures, and markets proprietary, value-added products and solutions to safeguard critical environments in the United States, Europe, Asia Pacific, and internationally. It operates in two segments, Sealing Technologies and Advanced Surface Technologies.
Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 4,000 employees
MWA vs NPO FAQ
Which is bigger, MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS or Enpro?
Enpro (NPO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.59B compared with $3.38B for MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS (MWA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MWA or NPO?
NPO returned +42.08% over the past 12 months, compared with -13.80% for MWA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MWA or NPO?
MWA has the lower trailing P/E at 15.2, versus 151.2 for NPO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS or Enpro?
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS has the higher yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.40% for Enpro.
Are MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS and Enpro in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Metal Fabrications industry within the Industrials sector.