Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAZ) vs Neuberger Municipal Fund (NBH)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
On valuation, Neuberger Municipal Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (12.9x vs 19.2x for Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund). Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (7.72% vs 7.33%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | NAZ | NBH |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $10.73 | $8.87 |
| 1-day change | +1.13% | -0.11% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 19.16 | 12.86 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.56 | $0.69 |
| Dividend yield | 7.72% | 7.33% |
| Annual dividend | $0.828 | $0.65 |
| 52-week high | $13.42 | $10.72 |
| 52-week low | $10.18 | $8.84 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -20.05% | -17.26% |
| Average volume | 32.05K | 103.84K |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance/Investors Services | Finance/Investors Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (19.2x vs 12.9x trailing P/E).
NAZ vs NBH FAQ
Which has the lower P/E ratio, NAZ or NBH?
NBH has the lower trailing P/E at 12.9, versus 19.2 for NAZ. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund or Neuberger Municipal Fund?
Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund has the higher yield at 7.72%, compared with 7.33% for Neuberger Municipal Fund.
Are Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund and Neuberger Municipal Fund in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance/Investors Services industry within the Finance sector.