NextEra Energy (NEE) vs Vistra (VST)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
NextEra Energy (NEE) has outperformed Vistra (VST) over the past year, losing 7.4% versus a loss of 16.5%. Over five years, VST leads with a +747.2% price change compared with -5.6% for NEE. NextEra Energy is the larger company by market cap ($160.75 billion vs $55.96 billion), about 2.9 times the size.
On valuation, Vistra trades at a lower forward P/E (16.0x vs 17.6x for NextEra Energy). NextEra Energy offers the higher dividend yield (3.09% vs 0.55%). NextEra Energy converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 26.5% versus 5.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | NEE | VST |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $77.06 | $166.72 |
| Market cap | $160.75B | $55.96B |
| 1-day change | -1.05% | +3.88% |
| YTD return | -4.01% | +3.34% |
| 1-year return | -7.39% | -16.48% |
| 5-year return | -5.64% | +747.15% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 17.32 | 27.06 |
| Forward P/E | 17.55 | 16.01 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.45 | $6.16 |
| Dividend yield | 3.09% | 0.55% |
| Annual dividend | $2.38 | $0.91 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $25.80B | $17.74B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.79% | +2.98% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $6.83B | $944.00M |
| Operating margin | 32.09% | 10.75% |
| Net margin | 26.49% | 5.32% |
| 52-week high | $98.75 | $217.10 |
| 52-week low | $74.41 | $132.66 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -21.96% | -23.21% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +26.42% | +26.11% |
| Average volume | 11.27M | 5.09M |
| Shares outstanding | 2.09B | 335.64M |
| Employees | 17,400 | 6,390 |
| Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| Industry | Electric Utilities: Central | Electric Utilities: Central |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- NextEra Energy is about 2.9 times larger than Vistra by market value ($160.75B vs $55.96B).
- Vistra trades at a higher earnings multiple (27.1x vs 17.3x trailing P/E).
- NextEra Energy offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.09% vs 0.55%).
- NextEra Energy is more profitable, keeping 26.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 5.3 cents for Vistra.
- NextEra Energy grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+9.79% vs +2.98%).
About NextEra Energy
NEE stock →NextEra Energy, Inc., through its subsidiaries, generates, stores, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power to retail and wholesale customers in North America. It operates through Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) and NEER segments.
Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 17,400 employees
About Vistra
VST stock →Vistra Corp., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an integrated retail electricity and power generation company in the United States. The company operates through five segments: Retail, Texas, East, West, and Asset Closure.
Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 6,390 employees
NEE vs VST FAQ
Which is bigger, NextEra Energy or Vistra?
NextEra Energy (NEE) is larger, with a market capitalization of $160.75B compared with $55.96B for Vistra (VST).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, NEE or VST?
NEE returned -7.39% over the past 12 months, compared with -16.48% for VST (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, NEE or VST?
NEE has the lower trailing P/E at 17.3, versus 27.1 for VST. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, NextEra Energy or Vistra?
NextEra Energy has the higher yield at 3.09%, compared with 0.55% for Vistra.
Are NextEra Energy and Vistra in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Electric Utilities: Central industry within the Utilities sector.