MetaCap

Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS) vs Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund (UTF)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (5.3x vs 8.4x for Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund). Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund pays a dividend yielding 7.46%, while Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

NMS versus UTF key metrics
MetricNMSUTF
Share price$9.74$25.35
Market cap$62.43M—
1-day change-0.92%-0.98%
P/E ratio (TTM)8.405.33
EPS (TTM)$1.16$4.76
Dividend yield7.76%7.46%
Annual dividend$0.00$1.89
52-week high$12.50$28.11
52-week low$9.48$23.42
Distance from 52-week high-22.08%-9.82%
Average volume33.12K302.50K
Shares outstanding6.41M—
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance CompaniesFinance Companies

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (8.4x vs 5.3x trailing P/E).

NMS vs UTF FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, NMS or UTF?

UTF has the lower trailing P/E at 5.3, versus 8.4 for NMS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund or Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund?

Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund has the higher yield at 7.76%, compared with 7.46% for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund.

Are Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Finance Companies industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons