Noah (NOAH) vs Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) has outperformed Noah (NOAH) over the past year, losing 13.6% versus a loss of 34.9%. Over five years, RFI leads with a -38.2% price change compared with -78.8% for NOAH. Noah is the larger company by market cap ($523.1 million vs $275.6 million), about 1.9 times the size.
On valuation, Noah trades at a lower trailing P/E (6.3x vs 8.8x for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund). Noah offers the higher dividend yield (61.22% vs 9.32%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | NOAH | RFI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $7.62 | $10.30 |
| Market cap | $523.08M | $275.64M |
| 1-day change | -1.42% | 0.00% |
| YTD return | -23.01% | -6.79% |
| 1-year return | -34.88% | -13.59% |
| 5-year return | -78.82% | -38.21% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 6.30 | 8.80 |
| Forward P/E | 5.24 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.21 | $1.17 |
| Dividend yield | 61.22% | 9.32% |
| Annual dividend | $4.67 | $0.96 |
| 52-week high | $12.45 | $12.07 |
| 52-week low | $7.60 | $10.25 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -38.80% | -14.66% |
| Analyst consensus | none | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +39.37% | — |
| Average volume | 105.05K | 94.26K |
| Shares outstanding | 68.65M | 26.76M |
| Employees | 1,582 | — |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- RFI has outperformed NOAH by 21.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (8.8x vs 6.3x trailing P/E).
- Noah offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (61.22% vs 9.32%).
About Noah
NOAH stock →Noah Holdings Limited, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a wealth and asset management service provider with the focus on investment and asset allocation services for high net worth individuals and corporate entities in Mainland of China, Hong Kong, and internationally. It operates through Domestic Public Securities, Domestic Asset Management, Domestic Insurance, Overseas Wealth Management, Overseas Asset Management, and Overseas Insurance and Comprehensive Services segments.
Finance · Investment Managers · 1,582 employees
About Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund
RFI stock →Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund, Inc. is a closed-ended equity mutual fund launched by Cohen & Steers, Inc.
Finance · Investment Managers
NOAH vs RFI FAQ
Which is bigger, Noah or Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund?
Noah (NOAH) is larger, with a market capitalization of $523.08M compared with $275.64M for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, NOAH or RFI?
RFI returned -13.59% over the past 12 months, compared with -34.88% for NOAH (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, NOAH or RFI?
NOAH has the lower trailing P/E at 6.3, versus 8.8 for RFI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Noah or Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund?
Noah has the higher yield at 61.22%, compared with 9.32% for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund.
Are Noah and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.