MetaCap

Nokia Sponsored (NOK) vs Zebra Technologies (ZBRA)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Nokia Sponsored (NOK) has outperformed Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) over the past year, gaining 109.9% versus a gain of 30.3%. Over five years, NOK leads with a +80.3% price change compared with -25.1% for ZBRA. Nokia Sponsored is the larger company by market cap ($59.46 billion vs $18.26 billion), about 3.3 times the size.

On valuation, Zebra Technologies trades at a lower forward P/E (17.4x vs 22.0x for Nokia Sponsored). Nokia Sponsored pays a dividend yielding 1.32%, while Zebra Technologies does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

NOK+114.95%ZBRA+28.01%
+254%+103%-48%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
NOK+83.45%ZBRA-22.50%
+178%+54%-71%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

NOK versus ZBRA key metrics
MetricNOKZBRA
Share price$10.62$386.05
Market cap$59.46B$18.26B
1-day change-3.19%+0.07%
YTD return+64.45%+59.17%
1-year return+109.86%+30.29%
5-year return+80.34%-25.07%
P/E ratio (TTM)75.8635.38
Forward P/E22.0017.39
EPS (TTM)$0.14$10.91
Dividend yield1.32%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.14$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)—$5.40B
Revenue growth (YoY)—+8.33%
Net income (latest FY)—$419.00M
Gross margin—48.05%
Operating margin—12.97%
Net margin—7.77%
52-week high$17.45$390.80
52-week low$5.09$199.05
Distance from 52-week high-39.14%-1.22%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+40.96%+7.20%
Average volume83.98M666.56K
Shares outstanding5.60B47.31M
Employees78,00510,700
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryCommunication EquipmentCommunication Equipment

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Nokia Sponsored is about 3.3 times larger than Zebra Technologies by market value ($59.46B vs $18.26B).
  • NOK has outperformed ZBRA by 79.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • Nokia Sponsored trades at a higher earnings multiple (75.9x vs 35.4x trailing P/E).
  • Nokia Sponsored offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.32% vs 0.00%).

About Nokia Sponsored

NOK stock →

Nokia Oyj, together with its subsidiaries, provides mobile, fixed, and cloud network solutions in North and Latin America, Greater China, India, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. It operates in four segments: Network Infrastructure, Mobile Networks, Cloud and Network Services, and Nokia Technologies.

Technology · Communication Equipment · 78,005 employees

About Zebra Technologies

ZBRA stock →

Zebra Technologies Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates in the automatic identification and data capture solutions industry worldwide. It operates in two segments, Connected Frontline, and Asset Visibility and Automation.

Technology · Communication Equipment · 10,700 employees

NOK vs ZBRA FAQ

Which is bigger, Nokia Sponsored or Zebra Technologies?

Nokia Sponsored (NOK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $59.46B compared with $18.26B for Zebra Technologies (ZBRA).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, NOK or ZBRA?

NOK returned +109.86% over the past 12 months, compared with +30.29% for ZBRA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, NOK or ZBRA?

ZBRA has the lower trailing P/E at 35.4, versus 75.9 for NOK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Nokia Sponsored or Zebra Technologies?

Nokia Sponsored pays a dividend yielding 1.32%, while Zebra Technologies does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Nokia Sponsored and Zebra Technologies in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Communication Equipment industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons