Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) vs ZeroStack (ZSTK)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) has outperformed ZeroStack (ZSTK) over the past year, losing 57.6% versus a loss of 75.9%. Over five years, NUS leads with a -88.4% price change compared with -99.9% for ZSTK. Nu Skin Enterprises is the larger company by market cap ($232.2 million vs $101.1 million), about 2.3 times the size.
Nu Skin Enterprises pays a dividend yielding 5.03%, while ZeroStack does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | NUS | ZSTK |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $4.77 | $4.64 |
| Market cap | $232.19M | $101.14M |
| 1-day change | -0.63% | -2.73% |
| YTD return | -50.42% | -25.88% |
| 1-year return | -57.64% | -75.87% |
| 5-year return | -88.38% | -99.88% |
| Forward P/E | 4.11 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $-4.51 | $-43.81 |
| Dividend yield | 5.03% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.24 | $0.00 |
| 52-week high | $11.67 | $20.45 |
| 52-week low | $4.45 | $1.32 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -59.13% | -77.31% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +167.71% | +137.07% |
| Average volume | 557.63K | 486.97K |
| Shares outstanding | 48.68M | 21.80M |
| Employees | 2,800 | 21 |
| Sector | Health Care | Financial Services |
| Industry | Other Pharmaceuticals | Asset Management |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Nu Skin Enterprises is about 2.3 times larger than ZeroStack by market value ($232.19M vs $101.14M).
- NUS has outperformed ZSTK by 18.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Nu Skin Enterprises offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.03% vs 0.00%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Nu Skin Enterprises in Health Care and ZeroStack in Financial Services.
About Nu Skin Enterprises
NUS stock →Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the development and distribution of various beauty and wellness products worldwide. It offers skin care devices, cosmetics, and other personal care products, including ageLOC LumiSpa, ageLOC LumiSpa iO, and Nu Skin RenuSpa iO; ageLOC TruFace and ageLOC LumiSpa cleansers and devices; Prysm iO, a data-enabled wellness device; and Nutricentials beauty and Beauty Focus wellness brands.
Health Care · Other Pharmaceuticals · 2,800 employees
About ZeroStack
ZSTK stock →ZeroStack Corp., through its subsidiary, Phatebo GmbH, engages in the pharmaceutical distribution business in Germany. It operates through Commercial & Wholesale and Digital Assets segments.
Financial Services · Asset Management · 21 employees
NUS vs ZSTK FAQ
Which is bigger, Nu Skin Enterprises or ZeroStack?
Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $232.19M compared with $101.14M for ZeroStack (ZSTK).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, NUS or ZSTK?
NUS returned -57.64% over the past 12 months, compared with -75.87% for ZSTK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Nu Skin Enterprises or ZeroStack?
Nu Skin Enterprises pays a dividend yielding 5.03%, while ZeroStack does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Nu Skin Enterprises and ZeroStack in the same industry?
No. Nu Skin Enterprises is in the Health Care sector, while ZeroStack is in Financial Services.